dolf
2018-09-19 20:14:07 UTC
— YOM KIPPUR (19 SEPTEMBER 2018): THE DANCING LESSONS OF THE CO-PRINCE OF
ANDORRA {COURAGEOUS, VALIANT, MANLY}
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 September, 2018
YOUTUBE: “Macron Takes More Dancing Lessons”
THEIR 28 LETTERS {ie. a superset of 22 Semitic elements} OF ARABIC SCRIPT
HATRED {#215 / #235} as fraudulent pretence to piety AND AN HABITUAL
CONTEMPT OF #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins), #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 - HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)
which doesn’t comply with the requisite dignity...
FACTS ON THE ARABIC LANGUAGE
Type: Abjad
Languages: Arabic
Time period: 356 AD to the present
Parent systems: Egyptian --> Proto-Sinaitic --> Phoenician --> Aramaic -->
Syriac --> Nabataean --> Arabic Alphabet
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_alphabet>]
YOUTUBE: “The King and I Etc , Etc , Etc.”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1452 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Queen Dolf of Sale has now invented one's own script:
'ARABRIC'.
Future gobbledigooks may be even harder to read than they are already."
DOLF @ 1521 HOURS ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "We are not interested in your
media statements but that which the President of the FRENCH REPUBLIC cares
to voluntarily make.
Save your statements for court.
That any statements you make will be presented in a court of law with
respects to impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL and constitutes TREASON.
That perjury by both members of the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and an
INSPECTOR OF POLICE are a breach of the VALUES OF OATH espoused by the:
“will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty;
and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and
Authorities, granted to Her Majesty, and annexed to the Crown by Acts of
Parliament, or *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL* *FOREIGN* *PRINCES*, *PERSONS*,
*PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR* *POTENTATES*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Fascist%20(Knights%20Templar%20International)/>
[IMAGES: WHICH INCLUDES AS THE THEIR IMAGES CONVEY SUCH ENTITIES AS
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL BY IMPETUS OF STATES / RELIGIONS / SOLDIERS /
ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS AS CONSTITUTING A FOREIGN POWER AND GENERALLY
IN ALL THINGS YOU WILL DO AS A FAITHFUL AND TRUE SERVANT OUGHT TO DO TO HER
MAJESTY. SO HELP YOU GOD]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1438 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Nope, no court would entertain such a presentation and
if you tried it you would be tossed out on your ear.
Treason is defined in our law and it does not include "impunity against the
DIGNITY ROYAL", one reason being that you appear to have misunderstood the
meaning of the word 'impunity'.
No, it does not [include the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL].
Nope, the High Court ruled on that in 1950, (Fulgar J, from memory) you are
incorrect.
Nobody is required to answer questions from you, Dolf.
No, it is not a "foreign power".
No it isn't. You are getting s44 of the Constitution mixed up with normal
oaths of office.
17 September 1900 was the proclamation of federation, nothing to do with
oaths of office.
That document [of 29 October 1900] was about the Governor-General's job,
and can't be "invoked" by a private citizen against other people.
It was not "instrumentation", it was an official appointment. The
"instrumentation" came in the form of twin Acts of Parliament."
My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 /
#33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our
{#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391
- HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria’s
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 <— *THAT* *IS* *TO* *IMPLY* *ADVICE* *
*FROM* *PRIVY* *COUNCIL* as the instrumentation of Federation into a
nation.
I believe that my claim has merit and that you claim our soldiers died for
some other cause is a slander and impetus for racial / religious / sexual
hatred which I am not going to tolerate and for which because it’s impetus
is the LETTERS PATENTS OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 which established a permanent
function as office of the Governor General then neither the EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION nor AMP INSURANCE are exempt from
legal action.
@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INRI
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 (HOMOIOS)
#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385} 1)
plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet, *DIADEM*;
@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity
@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;
In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that
is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my reasonable
objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33
- #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 /
#288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.
Which as DATA SET knowledge provided by the HEBREW / GREEK Biblical lexicon
being the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as coming into my possession as
expressed by a time stamped @ 2019 HOURS ON 28 JULY 2011, then had a
confirmation to its existence within my possession only upon 19 MAY 2016 in
having at such prior time been DATA MINED by my own undertaking and
ingenuity in being sourced from a *FOREIGN* *AGENT* named RICHARD AMIEL
MCGOUGH, whom is well educated within mathematics and quantum physics and
currently a software engineer at 4QTRS within YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA and this occurred following his debunked BIBLE WHEEL
PROJECT (2001-2011) as research MATERIAL which accompanied a selective
computed #288 - UMBRA by contrived GEMATRIA value being a DATA MANIPULATION
that whilst initially obscured by myself, regardlessly conveyed a clear
MENS REA {ie. the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes
part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused} of
defeasance (French: défaire, to undo) which within law, is an instrument
which defeats the force or operation of some other deed or estate; as
distinguished from condition, that which in the same deed is called a
condition is a defeasance in another deed. Thusly irrefutably sustains the
gravitas of my claim as to there being tangibility by ACTUS REUS {ie.
action or conduct which is a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to
the mental state of the accused} and therefore reasonable concerns for my
safety, wellbeing and security.
That in addition to falsified records of property on the brief of evidence
relating to my ARREST upon 11 NOVEMBER 2018 {
You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted,
done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown, or Dignity
Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your
Power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to
such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. [From
OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD of the “PRIVY COUNCIL” whom "ADVISED ON 17 SEPTEMBER
1900 TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900' expressing a
VALUE STATEMENT which dates back to at least 1570 and con
} which failed to convey that it occurred opposite the BOER WAR MEMORIAL
established upon 29 OCTOBER 1909 as being within my possession a letter
dated 8 November 2017 regarding these matters made to the STATE / FEDERAL
ATTORNEY GENERALS and a book titled "GOD THE CENTER OF VALUE [VALUE THEORY
IN THE THEOLOGY OF H RICHARD NIEBUHR (1894-1962)] BY C. DAVID GRANT"
published 1984, the sworn statements made TIMOTHY WISE on 20 November 2017
as TREASURER for the SALE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and INSPECTOR
SCOTT ANDREW BRENNAN on 13 November 2017 as police registered number 24927
fails as PERJURY to disclose evidence of a repetitious (3 times) question
made to the RSL representative concerning allegiance to the #390 - CROWN
and whether their participation within memorial services were undertaken in
concert with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL and therefore a FOREIGN POWER
which is prohibited by their OATH as per “*ADVICE* *OF* *OUR* *PRIVY*
*COUNCIL*” of 17 September 1900 and impetus for the invoking Queen
Victoria’s Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the
Federation as Australian Commonwealth 1901."
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that [B:
#233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of which
existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition,
but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that
determines the inner sense with respect to relation in time. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time; for
time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what follows in
objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it. I am
therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state before, the
other after, not that in the object [B: #234] one precedes the other; or,
in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that succeed one
another remains undetermined through mere perception. In order then for
this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation between the two
states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity
which of them must be placed before, which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which does not lie in
perception – and here it is the concept of the relation of cause and
effect, in which the former determines the latter in time as consequence,
and not merely as something that could precede it in the imagination (or
not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we subject the
succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality
that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive. [A:
#189] The representations of the parts succeed one another. Whether they
also succeed one another in the object is a further point for reflection,
which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact call
everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious of
it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this word
is to signify regarding [B: @235] appearances, not insofar as they (as
representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in so far as they
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
but [B: #236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [A: #191] unknown; what, then, shall I understand
by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the appearance
itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in the
successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [B: #237]
cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance that [A:
#192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality following upon
an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things precedes, can
be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of
an event is therefore a perception that follows upon another perception.
Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I
have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of perception
A and the succeeding one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension,
while the perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example
a ship drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down
succeeds the perception of its location further up the course of the river,
and it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In
the previous example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could
start at [B: #238] the top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the manifold
of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the series of these
perceptions there [A: #193] was, then, no determined order making it
necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in order to conjoin the
manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always to be met with in the
perception of something that happens, and it makes the order of the
perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension of this appearance)
necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
— HOMO ERECTUS —
"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS LEGS."
FROGSLEGS@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 61 (#61),
@2: Sup: 30 (#106); Ego: 63 (#124),
@3: Sup: 63 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 34 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
@4: Sup: 49 (#218); Ego: 72 (#230),
@5: Sup: 37 (#255); Ego: 27 (#257),
@6: Sup: 64 (#319); Ego: 23 (#280),
@7: Sup: 20 (#339); Ego: 18 (#298),
Male: #339; Feme: #298
}
#51 - There are four Cosmological Ideas. They mistakenly refer to the
completeness, which can never be experienced, of a series of conditions.
Pure reason makes four kinds of contradictory assertions about these Ideas.
These antinomies result from the nature of human reason and cannot be
avoided. [Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
"In the first place, the usefulness of a system of categories is here
revealed so clearly and unmistakably that even if there were no further
grounds of proof of that system, this alone would sufficiently establish
their indispensability in the system of pure reason. There are no more than
four such transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories;
in each of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of
the series of conditions for a given conditioned. In accordance with these
cosmological ideas there are also only four kinds of dialectical assertions
of pure reason, which show themselves to be dialectical because for each
such assertion a contradictory one stands in opposition in accordance with
equally plausible principles of pure reason, a conflict that cannot be
avoided by any metaphysical art of the most subtle distinctions, but that
requires the philosopher to return to the first [IDEA @339] sources of pure
reason itself. This antinomy, by no means arbitrarily contrived, but
grounded in the nature of human reason and so inevitable and never ending,
contains the following four theses together with their antitheses:
#1 - THESIS {The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary)}
/ ANTITHESIS {The world is, as to time and space, infinite}
#2 - THESIS {Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple} /
ANTITHESIS {There is nothing simple, but everything is composite}
#3 - THESIS {There exist in the world causes through freedom} / ANTITHESIS
{There is no freedom, but everything is nature}
#4 - THESIS {In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary
being} / ANTITHESIS {There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent}"[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @339]
<Loading Image...
>
<Loading Image...
>
<Loading Image...
>
<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGES: A common composition of posturing and cosmological elements exists
between INTERNET CAUSE CÉLÈBRE hate speech and Mural my artist Jeremy
Kasper]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1452 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Why does a nutter dwelling in a cheap flat permeated
with masturbatory funk in a small and remote Australian town nobody has
ever heard of, have any interest in what the frog president has to say?
Which court? I ask, because none of the real courts of this country will
ever find anything in relation to your gibberish except that it is an abuse
to present it to the court, and your sending it to people is - as per one
court's finding - extremely prejudicial to their rights, because it is
voluminous and non-sensical."
— VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
"SARCASM AND WIT.
IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT."
#18 - Judgments of experience are empirical judgments that are valid for
external objects. They require special pure concepts which have originated
in the pure understanding. All judging subjects will agree on their
experience of the object. When a perception is subsumed under these pure
concepts, it is changed into objective experience. On the other hand, all
empirical judgments that are only valid for the one judging subject are
judgments of mere perception. These judgments of perception are not
subsumed under a pure concept of the understanding. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
We must therefore first of all note: that, although all judgments of
experience are empirical, that is, have their basis in the immediate
perception of the senses, nonetheless the reverse is not the case, that all
empirical judgments are therefore judgments of experience; rather, beyond
the empirical and in general beyond what is given in sensory intuition,
special concepts must yet be added, which have their origin completely a
priori in the pure understanding, and under which every perception first
can be subsumed and then, by means of the same concepts, transformed into
experience.
Empirical judgments, insofar as they have objective validity, are JUDGMENTS
OF EXPERIENCE; those, however, that are only subjectively valid I call mere
JUDGMENTS OF PERCEPTION. The latter do not require a pure concept of the
understanding, but only the logical connection of perceptions in a thinking
subject. But the former always demand, in addition to the representations
of sensory intuition, special concepts originally generated in the
understanding, which are precisely what make the judgment of experience
objectively valid.
H6767@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 17 (#31); Ego: 9 (#17),
@4: Sup: 47 (#78); Ego: 30 (#47),
@5: Sup: 56 (#134); Ego: 9 (#56),
@6: Sup: 5 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 30 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 15 (#154); Ego: 10 (#96),
@8: Sup: 55 (#209); Ego: 40 (#136),
Male: #209; Feme: #136
} // #298
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #240 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10, #40] = tselatsal (H6767): {UMBRA:
#8 as #240 % #41 = #35} 1) *WHIRRING*, *BUZZING*; 2) spear; 3) whirring
locust;
"And David {well-beloved, dear} and all the house of Israel {who prevails
with God} played before the LORD on all manner of instruments made of fir
wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and on cornets,
and on cymbals {#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10, #40] = tselatsal
(H6767): cymbal}." [2Samuel 6:5 (KJV)]
All of our judgments are at first mere judgments of perception; they hold
only for us, i.e., for our subject, and only afterwards do we give them a
new relation, namely to an object, and intend that the judgment should also
be valid at all times for us and for everyone else; for if a judgment
agrees with an object, then all judgments of the same object must also
agree with one another, and hence the objective validity of a judgment of
experience signifies nothing other than its necessary universal validity.
But also conversely, if we find cause to deem a judgment necessarily,
universally valid (which is never based on the perception, but on the pure
concept of the understanding under which the perception is subsumed), we
must then also deem it objective, that is, as expressing not merely a
relation of a perception to a subject, but a property of an object; for
there would be no reason why other judgments necessarily would have to
agree with mine, if there were not the unity of the object – *AN* *OBJECT*
*TO* *WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *REFER*, *WITH* *WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *AGREE*,
*AND*, *FOR* *THAT* *REASON*, *ALSO* *MUST* *ALL* *HARMONIZE* *AMONG*
*THEMSELVES*. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @298]
DOLF @ 1750 HOURS ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It will be necessary to seek court
protection from these neo-nazi RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and ROMAN
CATHOLIC WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCILLORS.
It most certainly is a clear case of TREASON and RACIAL HATRED, ANTI
SEMITIC and SEXUAL PREJUDICE by the RSL / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL and
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL / ROMAN CATHOLICISM association with WORLD
WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS on REMEMBRANCE DAY 11 NOVEMBER 2018 and we
must implore the courts to ensure our safety."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1333 HOURS ON
17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Your Honour, I would like to apply for 24/7
round-the-clock police protection to protect me from the SALE RSL employees
and council employees, and their spouses while I mercilessly stalk them all
around town
Judge: 'Lock him up!'"
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1410 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Unfortunately, with the piss poor courts and the piss poor mental
health system we have in this country, he will have to seriously hurt some
innocent person before anything is done."
DOLF @ 1252 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I had to call the police due to an
instance of menacing and irrational conduct as alleged breaches to an
INTERVENTION ORDER which are subject to an appeal AP-18-0775 and there was
a woman loitering some 80 metres away within the park area who I couldn't
readily distinguish and whom the police later identified as the MARION
STATUE ARTIST that I had discoursed with @ 1739 / 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28
MAY 2018. I had in point of fact not spoken to her at all today and yet it
was being improperly alleged that I had upon this day ambushed, harangued
and verbalised her over some absurd impetus of 'SAVING THE WORLD'.
FOR ARTIST DIALOG SEE VINEGARETTE: "THE SHIP OF STATE (HEBREW STOICHEION
AND IT'S EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 METAPHOR) IS IN DEEP WATER"
dated 5 September 2018
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/4%20Vinegarette%2020180909.pdf>
And I castigated the police for engaging within falsehoods as I hadn't been
in proximity to that person as the contiguous timestamp of my photograph
and time of telephone call convey."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1647 HOURS ON
17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I notice he has something listed in the LA TROBE COUNTY
COURT regarding the matter of his 'surveillance operations'. Could be worth
delving into who is doing what on that one."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1751 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER
2018: "MAAKER -V- MURRAY?
Let us know how you get on Dolt."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "That is secret men's business and
suggests a level of information opportunity as access which is not normally
accessible to persons...
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Simple Google search."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Given the timestamp of the file
was published at 1625 hours (#364 / #273} and your advice about same was
made at 1647 hours as being only 22 minutes later.
“Pure mathematics contains only analytic propositions, but metaphysics
contains synthetic propositions a priori. Now he erred severely in this,
and this error had decisively damaging consequences for his entire
conception. For had he not done this, he would have expanded his question
about the origin of our synthetic judgments far beyond his metaphysical
concept of causality and extended it also to the possibility of a priori
mathematics; for he would have had to accept mathematics as synthetic as
well. But then he would by no means have been able to found his
metaphysical propositions on mere experience, for otherwise he would have
had to subject the axioms of pure mathematics to experience as well, which
he was much too reasonable to do. The good company in which metaphysics
would then have come to be situated would have secured it against the
danger of scornful mistreatment; for the blows that were intended for the
latter would have had to strike the former as well, which was not his
intention, and could not have been; and so the acute man would have been
drawn into reflections which must have been similar to those with which we
are now occupied, but which would have gained infinitely from his
inimitably fine presentation.
3. Properly metaphysical judgments are one and all synthetic. Judgments
belonging to metaphysics must be distinguished from properly meta- physical
judgments. Very many among the former are analytic, but they merely provide
the means to metaphysical judgments, toward which the aim of the science is
completely directed, and which are always synthetic. For if concepts belong
to metaphysics, e.g., that of substance, then the judgments arising from
their mere analysis necessarily belong to meta- physics as well, e.g.,
substance is that which exists only as subject, etc., and through several
such analytic judgments we try to approach the definition of those
concepts. Since, however, the analysis of a pure concept of the
understanding (such as metaphysics contains) does not proceed in a
different manner from the analysis of any other, even empirical, concept
which does not belong to metaphysics (e.g., air is an elastic fluid, the
elasticity of which is not lost with any known degree of cold), therefore
the concept may indeed be properly metaphysical, but not the analytic
judgment; for this science possesses something special and proper to it in
the generation of its a priori cognitions, which generation must therefore
be distinguished from what this science has in common with all other
cognitions of the understanding; thus, e.g., the proposition: All that is
substance in things persists, is a synthetic and properly metaphysical
proposition. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @273]
"The practical benefit that a purely speculative science may have lies
outside the boundaries of this science; such benefit can therefore be seen
simply as a scholium, and like all scholia does not form part of the
science itself. Nonetheless, this relation at least lies within the
boundaries of philosophy, and especially of that philosophy which draws
from the well- springs of pure reason, where the speculative use of reason
in metaphysics must necessarily have unity with its practical use in
morals. Hence the inevitable dialectic of pure reason deserves, in a
metaphysics considered as natural predisposition, to be explained not only
as an illusion that needs to be resolved, but also (if one can) as a
natural institution in accordance with its purpose – although this
endeavour, as supererogatory, cannot rightly be required of metaphysics
proper.
The solution to the questions that proceed in the Critique from pages 647
to 668 would have to be taken for a second scholium, more closely related
to the content of metaphysics. For there certain principles of reason are
put forward that determine the order of nature a priori, or rather
determine the understanding a priori, which is supposed to search for the
laws of this order by means of experience. These principles seem to be
constitutive and lawgiving with respect to experience, though they spring
from mere reason, which cannot, like the understanding, be regarded as a
principle of possible experience. Now whether this agreement may rest on
the fact that, just as nature does not in itself inhere in the appearances
or in their source, sensibility, but is found only in the relation of
sensibility to the understanding, so too, a thoroughgoing unity in the use
of this understanding, for the sake of a unified possible experience (in a
system), could belong to the understanding only in relation to reason,
hence experience, too, be indirectly subject to the legislation of reason –
this may be further pondered by those who want to track the nature of
reason even beyond its use in metaphysics, into the universal principles
for making natural history generally systematic; for in the book itself I
have indeed presented this problem as important, but have not attempted its
solution. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena
to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @364]
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Was it? Gee."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It seems to convey something of
you..."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Nope. I've got nothing. What does this mean? It *looks* like
English, but... ?"
DOLF @ 0922 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It wouldn’t be accessible via
GOOGLE SEARCH within a 22 minute timeframe and suggest a collective
[in]vest[iture] and prejudice by yourselves.
Your response is insufficient to establish causality."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Wouldn't it? Why?
The biggest conspiracy has always been the fact that there is no
conspiracy. Nobody's out to get you. Nobody gives a shit whether you live
or die. There, you feel better now? [Dennis Miller]
Oh dear! I'm devastated. :("
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: “Shouldn't you be in court?”
DOLF @ 1212 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I’m not at liberty to discuss
either filing deliberations with his Honour, the process of undertakings
agreed to, the proposition in resolving matters of questions nor the
strategy in seeking any legal recourse.
That previous statement ought read:
It wouldn't be accessible via GOOGLE SEARCH within a 22 minute timeframe
and suggests a collective vestige and prejudice by yourselves."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1321 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "How is this different from what you wrote earlier?"
DOLF @ 1338 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It would appear to me that I would
have recourse in relation to non-compliance to COURT ORDERS made upon 13
September 2017 as undertakings by the RESPONDENT but which were not
complied with by the time of the court hearing date of 25 October 2017 with
a clear threat conveyed upon 10 November 2017 and a subsequent equivalent
pursuit resulting in an assault an bodily harm upon 23 November 2017.
Contemporaneously on 13 September, the Federal Government introduced the
Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017. The bill received
royal assent on 13 September and went into effect the following day:
Section 15 - VILIFICATION etc. as a result of expressing views etc. in
relation to the marriage law survey question
(1) After this section commences, a person (the first person) must not
vilify, intimidate or threaten to cause harm to another person or persons
if the first person engaged in the conduct that vilified,
intimidated or threatened the other person or persons because of any of the
following:
(a) the other person or persons have expressed or hold a view in relation
to the marriage law survey question;
(b) the first person believes that the other person or persons hold a view
in relation to the marriage law survey question;
(c) the religious conviction, sexual orientation, gender identity or
intersex status of the other person or persons.
Note 1: This provision is a civil penalty provision which is enforceable
under the Regulatory Powers Act (see section 19 of this Act).
Note 2: For the geographical application of this section, see section 20.
Note 3: For when a broadcaster or carriage service provider does not
vilify, intimidate or threaten to cause harm, see the definition of vilify,
intimidate or threaten to cause harm in section 5.
Civil penalty: 60 penalty units.
(2) The first person does not engage in the conduct referred to in
subsection (1) by reason only of the expression of his or her views about
the marriage law survey question.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is done reasonably and in
good faith and is:
(a) the reporting of news, the presenting of current affairs or any
editorial content in news media; or
(b) the communication of matter solely for genuine satirical, academic or
artistic purposes; or
(c) the communication, distribution or dissemination of any matter
consisting of a publication that is subject to a defence of absolute
privilege in proceedings for defamation.
Note: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (3) in proceedings for a
civil penalty order bears an evidential burden in relation to a matter in
that subsection (see section 96 of the Regulatory Powers Act).
(4) In proceedings for a contravention of subsection (1), it is not
necessary to prove that:
(a) a specific person or group has expressed or holds a view in relation
to the marriage law survey question; or
(b) the first person believes that a specific person or group holds a view
in relation to the marriage law survey question.
<https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017A00096>
THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE SURVEY WAS HELD VIA THE POSTAL SERVICE BETWEEN 12
SEPTEMBER AND 7 NOVEMBER 2017. And the Act's provisions automatically
expired on 15 November 2017.
DOLF @ 1356 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “That 15 November 2017 was also the
date @ 1228 pictured when I received #419
- SLAUGHTERED MEAT in my mailbox:
<Loading Image...
>
#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (figurative);
43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
[#3, #11, #19, #27, #35, #43, #51, #59, #67]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#THREE}@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 14 (#17); Ego: 11 (#14),
@3: Sup: 33 (#50); Ego: 19 (#33),
@4: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 27 (#60),
@5: Sup: 14 (#124); Ego: 35 (#95),
@6: Sup: 57 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
{%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 43 (#138),
@7: Sup: 27 (#208); Ego: 51 (#189),
@8: Sup: 5 (#213); Ego: 59 (#248),
@9: Sup: 72 (#285); Ego: 67 (#315),
Male: #285; Feme: #315
}
Under the auspices of SECTION 9A(2) CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA 1958 I
repeatedly asked the treasurer of the SALE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL)
if he was either directly or indirectly associated with the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL as a FREEMASONRY order which is a prohibited foreign power
associated to the Saint Andrews cause célèbre which has a significant event
day upon 30 November and remembering that I had publicly cautioned as
advice that the same sex marriage plebiscite ought to be resolved before
this date and consequent to that it was so undertaken with the results
released upon the 15 November 2017. Additionally the Federal Parliament’s
House of Representatives was prorogued by the Prime Minister, the
Honourable Malcolm Turnbull just prior to 30 November 2017 and remained so
until the 4 December 2017.
(Omitted so as to comply with the probity of the COURT and the decorum of
the ORDERS subject to County Court Appeal Case: AP-18-0775)
[IMAGE: Conveys the RESPONDENT expressing a public opinion about the SAME
SEX MARRIAGE SURVEY which was subject to the Marriage Law Survey
(Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017]
Thus there was clearly instances of *VILIFICATION* etc. as a result of
expressing views etc. in relation to the marriage law survey question since
the RESPONDENT themselves had been photographed @ 0909 HOURS ON 27
SEPTEMBER 2017 placing “VOTE NO” in large taped graffiti upon both their
council RUBBISH BINS.”
DOLF @ 1442 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “That such actions can be
associated to both ANTI-SEMITISM / ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY as ostensibly the
basis for BOER / ANZAC cause célèbre prejudice accompanying unbridled
racial hatred.
YOUTUBE: “Handel's Messiah ‘Comfort Ye’ {#33 - #INRI, #331 - NOT, #419 -
SLAUGHTER on YOM KIPPUR sunset of 26 September 2001; #509 - YAHAD Dead Sea
Scroll Community} and ‘Every Valley Shall Be Exalted’”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=yrOVjoAp8oc>
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
[#1, #9, #17, #25, #33, #41, #49, #57, #65]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#ONE}@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 41 (#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
}
Nous: #33
Time: 12:10 hrs
Date: 2018.9.26
Torah: [#10, #7, #30]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 17 (#27); Ego: 7 (#17),
@3: Sup: 47 (#74); Ego: 30 (#47),
Male: #74; Feme: #47
} // #47
Dao: Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination
Tetra: #35 - Gathering
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest
Latin: Benedictus {God glorified in all things} Alt: Vambel {Repeated
Entrance of God} {
1. AIDS RECONCILIATION & CONJUGAL FAITHFULNESS
2. FRIENDSHIP & AFFABILITY
3. MEMORY, SHREWDNESS & DESIGN
4. Theosulk
}
Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties; that undresses}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#331 / #419} / HETEROS {#395 / #370} / TORAH {#339 /
#423}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:7,nous:33&idea:{m,87}&idea:{f,89}&idea:{m,331}&idea:{f,419}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 7, nous: 33 [Date: 2018.9.26, Time: 12:10
hrs, Super: #331 / #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model, Ego: #419 / #33 - Achievable Goals,
Virtue of Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor
Restraint, Small Accumulating, The taming power of the small, Small
harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering]
"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS THY
NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS IMPLEMENTATION:
{GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE
CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO which
is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
} // #270
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 - TORAH}
- Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
<Loading Image...
>
<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance]
THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: “Waste Pariah Dogs & Forgotten Garbage (Butcher Paper & Foam) by a
Lone Gum Tree @ Fitzroy Street, Sale” as pictured @ 1212 hours on 24 April,
2012 and an Intellectual Property right association to a trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon: #22 x #41 = #902 - RULE OF LAW
(EGALITÉ), #12 x #41 = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 -
HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)
#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach-kill (H2873): 1) to slaughter, slay,
butcher, kill ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to
slay, kill ruthlessly (fig.)
"THEY {#65 - SOLDIER} SHALL GROW *NOT* OLD, AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
AGE SHALL *NOT* WEARY THEM, NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN. {#231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN THE MORNING
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM." [LEST WE FORGET ODE]
#331 as [#300, #30, #1] = lo'-not (H3808): 1) *NOT*, *NO*; 1a) not (with
verb - absolute prohibition); 1b) not (with modifier - negation); 1c)
nothing (subst); 1d) without (with particle); 1e) before (of time)”
<Loading Image...
>
[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL NOUMENON AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY PANTOMIME ARREST
OF 25 APRIL 2006]
DOLF @ 1444 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “This sunset at 1805 hours on 18
SEPTEMBER 2018 commences YOM KIPPUR and I have redemption but you will #331
- *NOT*.”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1520 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Yay! A gag order!
The court has done something useful for once. Long may it last!”
AS THEN BEING ENTIRELY MISCHIEVOUS AND THE IMMATERIAL GROUNDS TO ADJOURN
THE MATTER FOR A FURTHER DIRECTIONS HEARING DATE OF 25 OCTOBER 2017.
THIS CLAIM OF YOUR TOTAL LACK OF PERSONAL INTEGRITY AS CIVILITY IS FURTHER
SUSTAINED BY THE FOLLOWING NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDERS MADE BY THE
REGISTRAR OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:
#1) FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS OF THE APPLICANT'S APPLICATION HAVE BEEN
FILED WITH THE COURT AND SERVED ON THE RESPONDENT'S MOTHER TODAY.
A) BEFORE THIS WRITTEN ORDER WAS RECEIVED BY THE RESPONDENT, THEY BREACHED
ORDERS (#1) BY PLACING THESE "FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS OF THE
APPLICANT'S APPLICATION" WITHIN MY MAILBOX.
B) THESE WERE PROVIDED BACK TO THE COURT AND THEY THEN CONTACTED THE
RESPONDENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER (#3) AND WHO REFUSED TO ACCEPT THESE
PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINT IN RELATION TO ALLEGED SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
IMPIOUS ACTIONS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DIRECTIONS HEARING AS A
PROCEEDING WHICH IS MADE UNDER THE PERSONAL SAFETY INTERVENTION ORDERS ACT
2010.
#2) RESPONDENTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS TO BE
FILED WITH THE COURTS BY 12 OCTOBER 2017.
#3) THE COURT REGISTRY TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FURTHER AND BETTER
PARTICULARS TO THE APPLICANT ONCE FILED.
A) I HAVE ATTENDED THE COURT ON FRIDAY 13 OCTOBER 2017 AND WAS ADVISED THAT
THE RESPONDENT HAD NOT "FILE RESPONSE TO FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS
WITH THE COURTS BY 12 OCTOBER 2017."
B) THE RESPONDENT HAS CLEARLY NO INTENTION TO EVER CONTEST THE MATTER
DESPITE YOUR PIOUS CLAIMS MADE TO THE COURT, BUT HAS TWICE ENGAGED WITHIN
FURTHER IRRATIONAL SELF JUSTIFYING BEHAVIOUR BY MAKING AGGRESSIVE
INTRUSIONS AT MY FRONT-DOOR DESPITE A NOTICE CONVEYING:
'NO ... COLD CALLERS OR CANVASSERS'
AND IMPROPERLY MAKING VIOLENT THREATS.
DIARY NOTES OF 0820 to 0853 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2017:
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:8.20>
I have @ 0820 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2017 left a telephone message for
TOWARDS ZERO WASTE management due to my recyclable garbage being FORGOTTEN
this morning of 10 November 2017
<http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.11.10>
And fortuitously as I was attending to my morning's activities I observed
the two drivers of the TOWARDS ZERO WASTE trucks having a coffee break at
the #123 ANGLICAN CHURCH coffee shop.
— PELLIAN KNELL —
"DREAD IN SISYPHUS DENIAL. OVER HEAVEN'S LAST TRIAL {#123}. THOU DOEST
FREELY TELL. NO CONFESSION TO COMPEL. THE SOUNDING OF THE KNELL.
SO BEGINS DOWNW'D SPIRAL. BY AN EVERLASTING QUELL. TO WELCOME GATES OF
HELL."
I mentioned that they had failed to collect my RECYCLABLE garbage bin and
they conveyed to me that they had observed the RESPONDENT removing the bins
from the street (as that which the RESPONDENT freely admits) and then
placing my FORGOTTEN bin back within the street immediately after
collection.
And they assured me that they will be around shortly to collect the
FORGOTTEN RECYCLABLE GARBAGE BIN.
I conveyed my observations to the RESPONDENT who was threatening and
abusive to such an irrational degree that I had to seek assistance from a
builder who was working on a building site nearby.
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:8.53>
@ 0853 HOURS the TOWARDS ZERO WASTE truck came by and @5 collected the ITEM
which had been intentionally interfered with.
HE SAID, "That fellow who brought out your bin just came to see me."
I REPLIED, "Thank you for confirming his identity and he was only trying to
concoct a story."
< (Omitted so as to comply with the probity of the COURT and the decorum of
the ORDERS subject to County Court Appeal Case: AP-18-0775)>
[IMAGE: Conveys the RESPONDENT threatening me in a manner contrary to the
Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017]
The RESPONDENT had earlier perused me down the street and was most
obsessive and compulsive in his hostile and irrational manner.
I SAID, "If you have something to contest, then raise it at court."
RESPONDENT replied, "I don't waste my time bringing things to court as I
take care of it myself.
I will do whatever it takes to deal with you."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1522 HOURS ON
18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “WTF is a ‘collective vestige’?
As far as know, this has no possible meaning.
Have you looked up ‘vestige’ in the dic[t]ionary, Dolf.”
Once again - just stop using words you don't understand and try to express
yourself clearly using the words of your vocabulary.”
DOLF @ 2013 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “It’s derived from the LATIN:
vestīgium n (genitive vestīgiī or vestīgī); second declension
footprint, track
trace, vestige, mark
sole of the foot
horseshoe
(figuratively, of time) moment, instant”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1842 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: I count this one as some of my finest work, despite the
missing context (you can rely on Dolf to disappear the context). I suspect
Dolf agrees, or he wouldn't be reproducing it to such an extent.
On a side note - we were discussing various malapropisms and imaginary
words at work the other day. I sprang to the defence of John Howard's "we
need to incentivise the jobless" and George Bush's "don't misunderestimate
me". There's nothing wrong with making up words if the result is
successfully communicative in either an informational or an entertainment
sense. Getting to the point: I've yet to see Dolf use English creatively in
such a way as to actually communicate anything beyond conveying a sense of
the confused state of his mind.”
DOLF @ 1542 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “WTF is a "collective vestige"?
Oh dry off will you...
YOUTUBE: “Deactivating Hal 9000 HD (COMPLETE)”
— TRUTH WHISPERS AS TEARS IN RAIN —
“WHAT OF GODHEAD.
AND IMAGO DEI.
OR TRUTH CONVEY?
BY PURE CONCEIT.
WHY BE WICKED.
SUCH AS THEE.
OF BLASPHEMY.
SELFISH DECEIT.
WHOM DID BLEED.
WAS IT NOT FOR ME?
YOUR COCK DENY.
NOW ALL FORFEIT.” [Written: 3 December 2017]
YOUTUBE: “Time to Die (Gary Numan)”
“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to #419 - KILL THE
SOUL: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in
hell.” [Matthew 10:28 (KJV)]
SOUL@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
@4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
@5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
{%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76 (#269),
@6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
@7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329 - *DRY* *OFF* / NEGATION OF PAPAL
PREROGATIVE TO GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS OF 1582),
@8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
Male: #233; Feme: #335
} // #902
#902 {#22 x #41 = #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ), #12 x #41 = #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 - HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)}
as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*, *APPETITE*,
*MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*; 1a) that which
breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the inner being of man;
1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the blood); 1d) the man
himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of
emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of
the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION
MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING)
AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON).
The distinction of ideas, that is of pure concepts of reason, from
categories, or pure concepts of the understanding, as cognitions of
completely different type, origin, and use, is so important a piece of the
foundation of a science which is to contain a system of all these
cognitions a priori that, without such a division, metaphysics is utterly
impossible, or at best is a disorderly and bungling endeavour to patch
together a house of cards, *WITHOUT* *KNOWLEDGE* of the materials with
which one is preoccupied and of their suitability for one or another end.
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #329 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance in
Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
G1558@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 29 (#59); Ego: 4 (#29),
@4: Sup: 39 (#98); Ego: 10 (#39),
@5: Sup: 59 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 20 (#59),
@6: Sup: 48 (#205); Ego: 70 (#129),
@7: Sup: 5 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}); Ego: 38 (#167),
Male: #210; Feme: #167
} // #329
#329 as [#5, #20, #4, #10, #20, #70, #200] = ekdikos (G1558): {UMBRA: #9 as
#329 % #41 = #1} 1) *WITHOUT* *LAW* *AND* *JUSTICE*; 2) exacting penalty
from one; 2a) an avenger, punisher;
YOUTUBE VIDEO: "Maurice Blackburn: Your Right Is My Right"
If the Critique of Pure Reason had done nothing but first point out this
distinction, it would thereby have already contributed more to elucidating
our conception of, and to guiding inquiry in, the field of metaphysics,
than have all the fruitless efforts undertaken previously to satisfy the
transcendent problems of pure reason, without it ever being imagined that
one may have been situated in a completely different field from that of the
understanding, and as a result was listing the concepts of the
understanding together with those of reason as if they were of the same
kind. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to
Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @329]
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF
*NUMBER*
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN -
*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH -
*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA* *OF*
*AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273, @274}, 3
{IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL
PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
THAT THE FIRST OBSERVATION IS UPON THIS #41 - *ONTIC* necessity which is
associated to IDEA: @329 that gives us a notion on temporality being the
beginning of the new year 1 JANUARY which commenced with the #329 -
GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS.
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION
MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING)
AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
Nous: #48
Time: 18:40 hrs
Date: 2018.1.1
Torah: [#40, #6, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 46 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 6 (#46),
@3: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 40 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #91; Feme: #86
} // #86
Dao: Forgetting Knowledge
Tetra: #20 - Advance
I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas
Latin: Revalator {God the end of all things} Alt: Mihael {The Who & What of
God} {
1. PROTECTS IN MYSTERIOUS OPERATIONS, BRINGS EVERY EXPERIENCE TO A HAPPY
CONCLUSION
2. SCIENCE OF PHYSICS & MEDICINE
3. HEALTH & LONGEVITY
4. Atembui
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#329 / #329} / HETEROS {#354 / #382} / TORAH {#354 /
#382}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:8,col:3,nous:48&idea:{m,48}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,329}&idea:{f,329}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.1.1, Time: 18:40
hrs, Super: #329 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas;
Tetra: 20 - Advance]
Secondly. is our capacity to deduce synaptic connections between various
ideas which Immanuel Kant might elsewhere espouse as then the basis for any
syncretism.
A reasonable postulate could be advanced that there is here an implicit
#312 - CONTENTION due to those #329 - GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS and the
mischievous prerogative BESTOWAL of #390 - WREATHS as RAPACIOUS CONDUCT
being an act of SEDITION:
H3001@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 13 (#30); Ego: 2 (#13),
@4: Sup: 23 (#53); Ego: 10 (#23),
@5: Sup: 80 (#133); Ego: 57 (#80),
@6: Sup: 5 (#138); Ego: 6 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #138; Feme: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM* / *RULERS*
} // #329
#329 as [#6, #5, #2, #10, #300, #6] = yabesh (H3001): {UMBRA: #5 as #312 %
#41 = #25} 1) to make dry, wither, be dry, become dry, be dried up, be
withered; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be dry, be dried up, be without moisture; 1a2)
to be dried up; 1b) (Piel) to make dry, dry up; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to dry
up, make dry; 1c1a) to dry up (water); 1c1b) to make dry, wither; 1c1c) to
exhibit dryness;
EXCERPT FROM LETTER TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS DATED 8 NOVEMBER
2017: "Commensurate with our 100 year celebration of the BeerSheba campaign
of the Charge of the Light Horse Brigade as celebrations which occurred on
31 October 2017 and the issue is the partiality and prejudiced Memorial
'Lest We Forget' Tributes comprising SEVEN {5 Wreaths and 2 Bouquets}
floral arrangements which were made during a ceremony presided over by the
RETURNED SERVICE LEAGUE AS A PUBLIC AUTHORITY and laid at only the World
War I and onwards Memorial Shrine for the War Dead upon the Saturday of 28
October 2017.
In the mistaken belief which was propagandised as the consideration that:
Battle of Beersheba 'should be the cornerstone of Australia's identity'
<http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/10/29/battle-beersheba-should-be-cornerstone-australias-identity>
No the Boer War is the cornerstone of Australian identity as ethos of
"OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING" and we reject CATEGORICALLY your
unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to Foreign Powers {ie.
especially Irish, Scottish, RSL / Freemasonry / Roman Catholic [by] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre} as all unconscionable attempts to impose a
substituted ethic @5 against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the
Sovereignty embodied within the Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE.
Such a statement of value as demonstrated by the inclusion of the State of
Israel's flag amongst the Ca[val]ry [within the] 100 year anniversary
re-enactment of the Battle of Beersheba is a priori, not mantric as dogma,
requires no apologetics and proffers the utmost tactical, endearing and
enduring advantage for posterity as prosperity...
In accordance with this pre-eminent value statement which was heartedly
adopted by the participants within that public ceremony which occurred
within the State of Israel, compliant with the 500 year anniversary of
Martin Luthers nailed #95 treatise which commenced the Protestant
Reformation and the [centenary to the] Balfour Declaration [occurring] 2
November 2017, I had upon Saturday of 28 October 2017 immediately removed
FOUR {3 Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements after th[is]
Remembrance Service made for the Beersheba Centenary and before the actual
events occurring within the State of Israel and doing so [entirely] without
neither authority nor notification given to [or by] another party.
I have thereafter maintained a photographic timeline of events and of
particular note is the regrettable circumstance, that although the THREE {2
Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements were removed from the main
Memorial Shrine, 82 Macalister Street, Sale upon the following Saturday 4
November 2017, they have remained in a dried {#368 as [#6, #10, #2, #300,
#10, #40] as yabesh (H3002): {UMBRA: #3 as #312 % #41 = #25} 1) dry; 2)
dried} state at the Boer War Memorial situated on the corner of York Street
/ Foster Street by the time the COURT ORDERS were made in the matter @ 1025
HOURS on 8 NOVEMBER 2017.
YOUTUBE: "Timbaland - Apologize ft. OneRepublic"
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1549 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Was I being optimistic in hoping that the last vestiges
of your sanity would enable you to provide a sensible answer?”
DOLF @ 1727 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “You have no answers yourself
So have a seat in the foyer and take a number...
YOUTUBE: “Imagine Dragons (Thunder)”
42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
#2 (9) - ILYEL (Seraphim-Throne) = #2
#10 (8) - ELDYAH (Cherubim-Throne) = #12
#18 (7) - KALIEL (Throne-Throne) = #30
#26 (6) - HAEYEH (Dominion-Throne) = #56
#34 (5) - LAHAHAYH (Powers-Throne) = #90
#42 (4) - MIKEL (Virtues-Throne) = #132
#50 (3) - DANIEL (Principalities-Throne) = #182
#58 (2) - YEILEL (Archangels-Throne) = #240
#66 (1) - MANQYAH (Angels-Throne) = #306
[#2, #10, #18, #26, #34, #42, #50, #58, #66]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#TWO}@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 30 (#44); Ego: 18 (#30),
@4: Sup: 56 (#100); Ego: 26 (#56),
@5: Sup: 9 (#109); Ego: 34 (#90),
@6: Sup: 51 (#160); Ego: 42 (#132),
@7: Sup: 20 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}),
@8: Sup: 78 (#258); Ego: 58 (#240),
@9: Sup: 63 (#321); Ego: 66 (#306),
Male: #321; Feme: #306
}
#321 as [#1, #80, #5, #10, #9, #5, #10, #1, #200] = apeitheia (G543): {#12
as #121 % #41 = #39} 1) obstinacy, obstinate *OPPOSITION* *TO* *THE*
*DIVINE* *WILL*;
#321 as [#3, #5, #5, #50, #50, #8, #200] = geenna (G1067): {#13 as #114 %
#41 = #32} 1) *HELL* is the place of the future punishment call Gehenna or
Gehenna of fire. This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of
Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and
burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their future destruction;
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #9 (3x3) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #10 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #15 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #45 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #60 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #120 {(Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #1080 {((Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
HETEROS (GK: ετερους = #1080)@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 67 (#134); Ego: 5 (#67),
@4: Sup: 5 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 19 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 75 (#214); Ego: 70 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@6: Sup: 70 (#284); Ego: 76 (#232),
@7: Sup: 27 (#311); Ego: 38 (#270),
Male: #311; Feme: #270 <-- *NULLIFICATION* *BY* *IMMANUEL* *KANT’S*
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS PUBLISHED 1783
}
HETEROS (GK: ετερους = #1080): STRONGS: G2087 as NUMBER as other or
different and obtained by Pythagorean reduction as the sum of each Magic
Square Line: @1 (#ONE) ... @5 (#TWO) ... #15 [@6 (#THREE)] ... #34 [@7
(#FOUR)] ... #65 [@2 (#FIVE)] ... #111 [@3 (#SIX)] ... #175 [@4 (#SEVEN)]
... #260 [@8 (#EIGHT)] ... #369 [@9 (#NINE)]:—altered, else, next (day),
one, (an-) other, some, strange #1 - Conservative Business
#2 - Real Estate
#3 - Mining
#4 - Undertakers
#5 - Jailers
#6 - Farmers
#7 - Masons
#8 - Bricklayers
#9 - Populace (?)
DOLF @ 0951 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by Almighty God that if
you ever say something of substance I might add it to my next chapter this
Yom Kippur...”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1002 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by almighty god that if you ever manage to
figure out how to stop top-posting I will stop calling you an idiot.”
DOLF @ 1010 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “So how long been talking to your
dick, that is if you can still see it past your belly?“
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 18 September 2018 as Yom Kippur edition
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
ANDORRA {COURAGEOUS, VALIANT, MANLY}
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 19 September, 2018
YOUTUBE: “Macron Takes More Dancing Lessons”
THEIR 28 LETTERS {ie. a superset of 22 Semitic elements} OF ARABIC SCRIPT
HATRED {#215 / #235} as fraudulent pretence to piety AND AN HABITUAL
CONTEMPT OF #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ: #22 x #41 as *ONTIC* necessity
comprising a subset of 21 consonants with #VOWELS of Semitic origins), #492
- VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 - HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)
which doesn’t comply with the requisite dignity...
FACTS ON THE ARABIC LANGUAGE
Type: Abjad
Languages: Arabic
Time period: 356 AD to the present
Parent systems: Egyptian --> Proto-Sinaitic --> Phoenician --> Aramaic -->
Syriac --> Nabataean --> Arabic Alphabet
[<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arabic_alphabet>]
YOUTUBE: “The King and I Etc , Etc , Etc.”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1452 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Queen Dolf of Sale has now invented one's own script:
'ARABRIC'.
Future gobbledigooks may be even harder to read than they are already."
DOLF @ 1521 HOURS ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "We are not interested in your
media statements but that which the President of the FRENCH REPUBLIC cares
to voluntarily make.
Save your statements for court.
That any statements you make will be presented in a court of law with
respects to impunity against the DIGNITY ROYAL and constitutes TREASON.
That perjury by both members of the RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and an
INSPECTOR OF POLICE are a breach of the VALUES OF OATH espoused by the:
“will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty;
and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and
Authorities, granted to Her Majesty, and annexed to the Crown by Acts of
Parliament, or *OTHERWISE*, *AGAINST* *ALL* *FOREIGN* *PRINCES*, *PERSONS*,
*PRELATES*, *STATES*, *OR* *POTENTATES*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Fascist%20(Knights%20Templar%20International)/>
[IMAGES: WHICH INCLUDES AS THE THEIR IMAGES CONVEY SUCH ENTITIES AS
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL BY IMPETUS OF STATES / RELIGIONS / SOLDIERS /
ORGANISATIONS / INSTITUTIONS AS CONSTITUTING A FOREIGN POWER AND GENERALLY
IN ALL THINGS YOU WILL DO AS A FAITHFUL AND TRUE SERVANT OUGHT TO DO TO HER
MAJESTY. SO HELP YOU GOD]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1438 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Nope, no court would entertain such a presentation and
if you tried it you would be tossed out on your ear.
Treason is defined in our law and it does not include "impunity against the
DIGNITY ROYAL", one reason being that you appear to have misunderstood the
meaning of the word 'impunity'.
No, it does not [include the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL].
Nope, the High Court ruled on that in 1950, (Fulgar J, from memory) you are
incorrect.
Nobody is required to answer questions from you, Dolf.
No, it is not a "foreign power".
No it isn't. You are getting s44 of the Constitution mixed up with normal
oaths of office.
17 September 1900 was the proclamation of federation, nothing to do with
oaths of office.
That document [of 29 October 1900] was about the Governor-General's job,
and can't be "invoked" by a private citizen against other people.
It was not "instrumentation", it was an official appointment. The
"instrumentation" came in the form of twin Acts of Parliament."
My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 /
#33 - #INRI / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our
{#390 / #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391
- HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria’s
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 <— *THAT* *IS* *TO* *IMPLY* *ADVICE* *
*FROM* *PRIVY* *COUNCIL* as the instrumentation of Federation into a
nation.
I believe that my claim has merit and that you claim our soldiers died for
some other cause is a slander and impetus for racial / religious / sexual
hatred which I am not going to tolerate and for which because it’s impetus
is the LETTERS PATENTS OF 29 OCTOBER 1900 which established a permanent
function as office of the Governor General then neither the EQUAL
OPPORTUNITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION nor AMP INSURANCE are exempt from
legal action.
@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INRI
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 (HOMOIOS)
#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385} 1)
plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet, *DIADEM*;
@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity
@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;
In whatever circumstance, it is capable of being hosted upon the
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS as it's mechanism for delivery and
staging which then becomes an acute and risky precipice consideration that
is accorded entirely by my Intellectual Property and thusly my reasonable
objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 / #33
- #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390 /
#288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth's Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.
Which as DATA SET knowledge provided by the HEBREW / GREEK Biblical lexicon
being the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING as coming into my possession as
expressed by a time stamped @ 2019 HOURS ON 28 JULY 2011, then had a
confirmation to its existence within my possession only upon 19 MAY 2016 in
having at such prior time been DATA MINED by my own undertaking and
ingenuity in being sourced from a *FOREIGN* *AGENT* named RICHARD AMIEL
MCGOUGH, whom is well educated within mathematics and quantum physics and
currently a software engineer at 4QTRS within YAKIMA, WASHINGTON, UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA and this occurred following his debunked BIBLE WHEEL
PROJECT (2001-2011) as research MATERIAL which accompanied a selective
computed #288 - UMBRA by contrived GEMATRIA value being a DATA MANIPULATION
that whilst initially obscured by myself, regardlessly conveyed a clear
MENS REA {ie. the intention or knowledge of wrongdoing that constitutes
part of a crime, as opposed to the action or conduct of the accused} of
defeasance (French: défaire, to undo) which within law, is an instrument
which defeats the force or operation of some other deed or estate; as
distinguished from condition, that which in the same deed is called a
condition is a defeasance in another deed. Thusly irrefutably sustains the
gravitas of my claim as to there being tangibility by ACTUS REUS {ie.
action or conduct which is a constituent element of a crime, as opposed to
the mental state of the accused} and therefore reasonable concerns for my
safety, wellbeing and security.
That in addition to falsified records of property on the brief of evidence
relating to my ARREST upon 11 NOVEMBER 2018 {
You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted,
done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person, Honour, Crown, or Dignity
Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your
Power, and either cause it to be revealed to Her Majesty Herself, or to
such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. [From
OATH BY ALMIGHTY GOD of the “PRIVY COUNCIL” whom "ADVISED ON 17 SEPTEMBER
1900 TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT OF 29 OCTOBER 1900' expressing a
VALUE STATEMENT which dates back to at least 1570 and con
} which failed to convey that it occurred opposite the BOER WAR MEMORIAL
established upon 29 OCTOBER 1909 as being within my possession a letter
dated 8 November 2017 regarding these matters made to the STATE / FEDERAL
ATTORNEY GENERALS and a book titled "GOD THE CENTER OF VALUE [VALUE THEORY
IN THE THEOLOGY OF H RICHARD NIEBUHR (1894-1962)] BY C. DAVID GRANT"
published 1984, the sworn statements made TIMOTHY WISE on 20 November 2017
as TREASURER for the SALE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and INSPECTOR
SCOTT ANDREW BRENNAN on 13 November 2017 as police registered number 24927
fails as PERJURY to disclose evidence of a repetitious (3 times) question
made to the RSL representative concerning allegiance to the #390 - CROWN
and whether their participation within memorial services were undertaken in
concert with KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL and therefore a FOREIGN POWER
which is prohibited by their OATH as per “*ADVICE* *OF* *OUR* *PRIVY*
*COUNCIL*” of 17 September 1900 and impetus for the invoking Queen
Victoria’s Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the
Federation as Australian Commonwealth 1901."
ALL ALTERATIONS TAKE PLACE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW OF THE CONNECTION OF
CAUSE AND EFFECT.
PROOF: I perceive that appearances succeed one another, that is, that [B:
#233] one state of a thing exists at one time, the opposite of which
existed in the previous state. I am therefore actually connecting two
perceptions in time. Now connection is no act of mere sense and intuition,
but is here the product of a synthetic faculty of the imagination that
determines the inner sense with respect to relation in time. The
imagination can however conjoin the aforementioned two states in two
different ways, so that either one or the other would precede in time; for
time cannot be perceived in itself and what precedes and what follows in
objects determined, as it were empirically, in relation to it. I am
therefore conscious only that my imagination places one state before, the
other after, not that in the object [B: #234] one precedes the other; or,
in other words, the objective relation of the appearances that succeed one
another remains undetermined through mere perception. In order then for
this relation to be cognized as determined, the relation between the two
states must be so thought that it is thereby determined with necessity
which of them must be placed before, which after, and not the reverse.
However, the concept that carries with it a necessity of synthetic unity
can only be a pure concept of the understanding, which does not lie in
perception – and here it is the concept of the relation of cause and
effect, in which the former determines the latter in time as consequence,
and not merely as something that could precede it in the imagination (or
not be perceived at all). It is, then, only because we subject the
succession of appearances, hence all alterations, to the law of causality
that experience itself – i.e., empirical cognition of the appearances – is
possible; hence the appearances themselves as objects of experience are
possible only in accordance with this very law.
The apprehension of the manifold of appearances is always successive. [A:
#189] The representations of the parts succeed one another. Whether they
also succeed one another in the object is a further point for reflection,
which is not included in the first point. Now one can in fact call
everything, and even every representation insofar as one is conscious of
it, an object; but it is a matter for deeper investigation what this word
is to signify regarding [B: @235] appearances, not insofar as they (as
representations) [A: @190] are objects, but only in so far as they
designate an object. In as much as they, merely as representations, are at
the same time objects of consciousness, they are not at all to be
distinguished from apprehension, i.e., reception into the synthesis of the
imagination, and one must then say: that the manifold of appearances is
always generated successively in the mind. Were appearances things in
themselves, then no human being would be able to conclude from the
succession of representations how the manifold of those appearances might
be conjoined in the object. For in the end we have to do only with our own
representations; how things in themselves may be (without regard to
representations through which they affect us) is completely beyond our
sphere of cognition. Now although the appearances are not things in
themselves, and nevertheless are the only thing that can be given to us for
cognition, I still have to show what in the appearances themselves may suit
the manifold for a conjoining in time, notwithstanding that its
representation in apprehension is always successive. Thus, for example, the
apprehension of the manifold in the appearances of a house that stands
before me is successive. Now the question is: whether the manifold of this
house itself also is successive in itself, which of course no one will
grant. However, as soon as I raise my concept of an object up to
transcendental significance, the house is now indeed no thing in itself,
but [B: #236] only an appearance, i.e., a representation, whose
transcendental object is [A: #191] unknown; what, then, shall I understand
by the question: how might the manifold be conjoined in the appearance
itself (which is still nothing in itself )? That which lies in the
successive apprehension is here viewed as representation, while the
appearance that is given to me, notwithstanding that it is nothing more
than a sum of such representations, is viewed as their object – with which
my concept, which I extract from the representations of apprehension, has
to agree. Since truth is the agreement of cognition with object, it can
easily be seen that here one can ask only about the formal conditions of
empirical truth, and that appearance, in counter-relation with the
representations of apprehension, can only be represented as their object
that is distinct from them if it falls under a rule that distinguishes it
from every other apprehension and makes one way of conjoining the manifold
necessary. That in the appearance which contains the condition of this
necessary rule of apprehension is the object.
Let us now proceed to our problem. That something happens – i.e., that
something, or some state, comes to be that wasn’t there before – [B: #237]
cannot be perceived empirically unless preceded by an appearance that [A:
#192] does not contain this state in itself; for a reality following upon
an empty time, hence, a coming to be that no state of things precedes, can
be apprehended just as little as empty time itself. Every apprehension of
an event is therefore a perception that follows upon another perception.
Since this is, though, the case with every synthesis of apprehension, as I
have shown above in the appearance of a house, it does not in this way yet
distinguish itself from the others. But I also note: that if, in an
appearance containing a happening, I call the preceding state of perception
A and the succeeding one B, then B can only follow A in the apprehension,
while the perception a cannot follow but only precede B. I see for example
a ship drifting downstream. My perception of its location further down
succeeds the perception of its location further up the course of the river,
and it is impossible that in the apprehension of this appearance the ship
should first be perceived further downstream but afterwards further
upstream. Here, then, the order in the succession of perceptions in the
apprehension is determined, and the apprehension is bound by that order. In
the previous example of a house, in the apprehension my perceptions could
start at [B: #238] the top of the house and end with the ground, or else
start from below and end above, just as they could apprehend the manifold
of empirical intuition from the right or the left. In the series of these
perceptions there [A: #193] was, then, no determined order making it
necessary when in the apprehension I had to begin in order to conjoin the
manifold empirically. This rule is, however, always to be met with in the
perception of something that happens, and it makes the order of the
perceptions succeeding one another (in the apprehension of this appearance)
necessary.
In our case, therefore, I will have to derive the subjective sequence of
the apprehension from the objective sequence of the appearances, because
otherwise the former is completely undetermined and does not distinguish
any one appearance from the rest. By itself the former proves nothing about
the connection of the manifold in the object, because it is completely
arbitrary. This connection will therefore consist in the order of the
manifold of the appearance according to which the apprehension of the one
(what happens) follows upon that of the other (which precedes) according to
a rule. Only in this way can I gain the right to say of the appearance
itself, and not merely of my apprehension: that in it a sequence is to be
found – which is as much as to say that I cannot institute the apprehension
otherwise than exactly in this sequence. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF
PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, SECOND ANALOGY of
ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES, pp 184-187]
— HOMO ERECTUS —
"SUCH LOAD OF WADDLE.
THE TRUTH JUST BEGS.
OVER DUCKING TWADDLE.
VENOM POSTURING DREGS.
WHAT CAN YOU SADDLE?
WITH ONLY FROGS LEGS."
FROGSLEGS@{
@1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 61 (#61),
@2: Sup: 30 (#106); Ego: 63 (#124),
@3: Sup: 63 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 34 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}),
@4: Sup: 49 (#218); Ego: 72 (#230),
@5: Sup: 37 (#255); Ego: 27 (#257),
@6: Sup: 64 (#319); Ego: 23 (#280),
@7: Sup: 20 (#339); Ego: 18 (#298),
Male: #339; Feme: #298
}
#51 - There are four Cosmological Ideas. They mistakenly refer to the
completeness, which can never be experienced, of a series of conditions.
Pure reason makes four kinds of contradictory assertions about these Ideas.
These antinomies result from the nature of human reason and cannot be
avoided. [Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
"In the first place, the usefulness of a system of categories is here
revealed so clearly and unmistakably that even if there were no further
grounds of proof of that system, this alone would sufficiently establish
their indispensability in the system of pure reason. There are no more than
four such transcendent ideas, as many as there are classes of categories;
in each of them, however, they refer only to the absolute completeness of
the series of conditions for a given conditioned. In accordance with these
cosmological ideas there are also only four kinds of dialectical assertions
of pure reason, which show themselves to be dialectical because for each
such assertion a contradictory one stands in opposition in accordance with
equally plausible principles of pure reason, a conflict that cannot be
avoided by any metaphysical art of the most subtle distinctions, but that
requires the philosopher to return to the first [IDEA @339] sources of pure
reason itself. This antinomy, by no means arbitrarily contrived, but
grounded in the nature of human reason and so inevitable and never ending,
contains the following four theses together with their antitheses:
#1 - THESIS {The world has, as to time and space, a beginning (a boundary)}
/ ANTITHESIS {The world is, as to time and space, infinite}
#2 - THESIS {Everything in the world is constituted out of the simple} /
ANTITHESIS {There is nothing simple, but everything is composite}
#3 - THESIS {There exist in the world causes through freedom} / ANTITHESIS
{There is no freedom, but everything is nature}
#4 - THESIS {In the series of causes in the world there is a necessary
being} / ANTITHESIS {There is nothing necessary in this series, but in it
everything is contingent}"[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
Kant's Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @339]
<Loading Image...
><Loading Image...
><Loading Image...
><Loading Image...
>[IMAGES: A common composition of posturing and cosmological elements exists
between INTERNET CAUSE CÉLÈBRE hate speech and Mural my artist Jeremy
Kasper]
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1452 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Why does a nutter dwelling in a cheap flat permeated
with masturbatory funk in a small and remote Australian town nobody has
ever heard of, have any interest in what the frog president has to say?
Which court? I ask, because none of the real courts of this country will
ever find anything in relation to your gibberish except that it is an abuse
to present it to the court, and your sending it to people is - as per one
court's finding - extremely prejudicial to their rights, because it is
voluminous and non-sensical."
— VIRTUAL CONCEIT WALL —
"SARCASM AND WIT.
IS FAVOURED HUMOUR.
TO NARCISSISTIC DECEIT.
OF DISEASE AND TUMOUR.
YOUR MURDEROUS HEAT."
#18 - Judgments of experience are empirical judgments that are valid for
external objects. They require special pure concepts which have originated
in the pure understanding. All judging subjects will agree on their
experience of the object. When a perception is subsumed under these pure
concepts, it is changed into objective experience. On the other hand, all
empirical judgments that are only valid for the one judging subject are
judgments of mere perception. These judgments of perception are not
subsumed under a pure concept of the understanding. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]
We must therefore first of all note: that, although all judgments of
experience are empirical, that is, have their basis in the immediate
perception of the senses, nonetheless the reverse is not the case, that all
empirical judgments are therefore judgments of experience; rather, beyond
the empirical and in general beyond what is given in sensory intuition,
special concepts must yet be added, which have their origin completely a
priori in the pure understanding, and under which every perception first
can be subsumed and then, by means of the same concepts, transformed into
experience.
Empirical judgments, insofar as they have objective validity, are JUDGMENTS
OF EXPERIENCE; those, however, that are only subjectively valid I call mere
JUDGMENTS OF PERCEPTION. The latter do not require a pure concept of the
understanding, but only the logical connection of perceptions in a thinking
subject. But the former always demand, in addition to the representations
of sensory intuition, special concepts originally generated in the
understanding, which are precisely what make the judgment of experience
objectively valid.
H6767@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 8 (#14); Ego: 2 (#8),
@3: Sup: 17 (#31); Ego: 9 (#17),
@4: Sup: 47 (#78); Ego: 30 (#47),
@5: Sup: 56 (#134); Ego: 9 (#56),
@6: Sup: 5 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 30 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@7: Sup: 15 (#154); Ego: 10 (#96),
@8: Sup: 55 (#209); Ego: 40 (#136),
Male: #209; Feme: #136
} // #298
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #240 % #41 = #35 - Great Guiding Signs?, Virtue of Benevolence;
I-Ching: H17 - Following, Allegiance; Tetra: 19 - Following;
THOTH MEASURE: #35 - Oh Tem-sepu, who makest thine appearance in Tattu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *ONE* *WHO* *CURSETH* *THE* *KING*.
#VIRTUE: As to Gathering (no. #35), it is success.
#TOOLS: With Failure (no. #75), loss of fortune.
#POSITION: With Ascent (no. #7), high ambitions.
#TIME: With Sinking (no. #64), low ambitions.
#CANON: #181
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_181@{
@1: Sup: 35 (#35); Ego: 35 (#35),
@2: Sup: 29 (#64); Ego: 75 (#110),
@3: Sup: 36 (#100); Ego: 7 (#117),
@4: Sup: 19 (#119); Ego: 64 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #119; Feme: #181
} // #181
#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10, #40] = tselatsal (H6767): {UMBRA:
#8 as #240 % #41 = #35} 1) *WHIRRING*, *BUZZING*; 2) spear; 3) whirring
locust;
"And David {well-beloved, dear} and all the house of Israel {who prevails
with God} played before the LORD on all manner of instruments made of fir
wood, even on harps, and on psalteries, and on timbrels, and on cornets,
and on cymbals {#298 as [#6, #2, #90, #30, #90, #30, #10, #40] = tselatsal
(H6767): cymbal}." [2Samuel 6:5 (KJV)]
All of our judgments are at first mere judgments of perception; they hold
only for us, i.e., for our subject, and only afterwards do we give them a
new relation, namely to an object, and intend that the judgment should also
be valid at all times for us and for everyone else; for if a judgment
agrees with an object, then all judgments of the same object must also
agree with one another, and hence the objective validity of a judgment of
experience signifies nothing other than its necessary universal validity.
But also conversely, if we find cause to deem a judgment necessarily,
universally valid (which is never based on the perception, but on the pure
concept of the understanding under which the perception is subsumed), we
must then also deem it objective, that is, as expressing not merely a
relation of a perception to a subject, but a property of an object; for
there would be no reason why other judgments necessarily would have to
agree with mine, if there were not the unity of the object – *AN* *OBJECT*
*TO* *WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *REFER*, *WITH* *WHICH* *THEY* *ALL* *AGREE*,
*AND*, *FOR* *THAT* *REASON*, *ALSO* *MUST* *ALL* *HARMONIZE* *AMONG*
*THEMSELVES*. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @298]
DOLF @ 1750 HOURS ON 15 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It will be necessary to seek court
protection from these neo-nazi RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL) and ROMAN
CATHOLIC WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCILLORS.
It most certainly is a clear case of TREASON and RACIAL HATRED, ANTI
SEMITIC and SEXUAL PREJUDICE by the RSL / WELLINGTON SHIRE COUNCIL and
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR INTERNATIONAL / ROMAN CATHOLICISM association with WORLD
WAR I CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS on REMEMBRANCE DAY 11 NOVEMBER 2018 and we
must implore the courts to ensure our safety."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1333 HOURS ON
17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Your Honour, I would like to apply for 24/7
round-the-clock police protection to protect me from the SALE RSL employees
and council employees, and their spouses while I mercilessly stalk them all
around town
Judge: 'Lock him up!'"
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1410 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Unfortunately, with the piss poor courts and the piss poor mental
health system we have in this country, he will have to seriously hurt some
innocent person before anything is done."
DOLF @ 1252 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I had to call the police due to an
instance of menacing and irrational conduct as alleged breaches to an
INTERVENTION ORDER which are subject to an appeal AP-18-0775 and there was
a woman loitering some 80 metres away within the park area who I couldn't
readily distinguish and whom the police later identified as the MARION
STATUE ARTIST that I had discoursed with @ 1739 / 1747 HOURS ON MONDAY 28
MAY 2018. I had in point of fact not spoken to her at all today and yet it
was being improperly alleged that I had upon this day ambushed, harangued
and verbalised her over some absurd impetus of 'SAVING THE WORLD'.
FOR ARTIST DIALOG SEE VINEGARETTE: "THE SHIP OF STATE (HEBREW STOICHEION
AND IT'S EGYPTIAN BOOK OF THE DEAD CHAPTER #99 METAPHOR) IS IN DEEP WATER"
dated 5 September 2018
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/4%20Vinegarette%2020180909.pdf>
And I castigated the police for engaging within falsehoods as I hadn't been
in proximity to that person as the contiguous timestamp of my photograph
and time of telephone call convey."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1647 HOURS ON
17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I notice he has something listed in the LA TROBE COUNTY
COURT regarding the matter of his 'surveillance operations'. Could be worth
delving into who is doing what on that one."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1751 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER
2018: "MAAKER -V- MURRAY?
Let us know how you get on Dolt."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "That is secret men's business and
suggests a level of information opportunity as access which is not normally
accessible to persons...
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Simple Google search."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Given the timestamp of the file
was published at 1625 hours (#364 / #273} and your advice about same was
made at 1647 hours as being only 22 minutes later.
“Pure mathematics contains only analytic propositions, but metaphysics
contains synthetic propositions a priori. Now he erred severely in this,
and this error had decisively damaging consequences for his entire
conception. For had he not done this, he would have expanded his question
about the origin of our synthetic judgments far beyond his metaphysical
concept of causality and extended it also to the possibility of a priori
mathematics; for he would have had to accept mathematics as synthetic as
well. But then he would by no means have been able to found his
metaphysical propositions on mere experience, for otherwise he would have
had to subject the axioms of pure mathematics to experience as well, which
he was much too reasonable to do. The good company in which metaphysics
would then have come to be situated would have secured it against the
danger of scornful mistreatment; for the blows that were intended for the
latter would have had to strike the former as well, which was not his
intention, and could not have been; and so the acute man would have been
drawn into reflections which must have been similar to those with which we
are now occupied, but which would have gained infinitely from his
inimitably fine presentation.
3. Properly metaphysical judgments are one and all synthetic. Judgments
belonging to metaphysics must be distinguished from properly meta- physical
judgments. Very many among the former are analytic, but they merely provide
the means to metaphysical judgments, toward which the aim of the science is
completely directed, and which are always synthetic. For if concepts belong
to metaphysics, e.g., that of substance, then the judgments arising from
their mere analysis necessarily belong to meta- physics as well, e.g.,
substance is that which exists only as subject, etc., and through several
such analytic judgments we try to approach the definition of those
concepts. Since, however, the analysis of a pure concept of the
understanding (such as metaphysics contains) does not proceed in a
different manner from the analysis of any other, even empirical, concept
which does not belong to metaphysics (e.g., air is an elastic fluid, the
elasticity of which is not lost with any known degree of cold), therefore
the concept may indeed be properly metaphysical, but not the analytic
judgment; for this science possesses something special and proper to it in
the generation of its a priori cognitions, which generation must therefore
be distinguished from what this science has in common with all other
cognitions of the understanding; thus, e.g., the proposition: All that is
substance in things persists, is a synthetic and properly metaphysical
proposition. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @273]
"The practical benefit that a purely speculative science may have lies
outside the boundaries of this science; such benefit can therefore be seen
simply as a scholium, and like all scholia does not form part of the
science itself. Nonetheless, this relation at least lies within the
boundaries of philosophy, and especially of that philosophy which draws
from the well- springs of pure reason, where the speculative use of reason
in metaphysics must necessarily have unity with its practical use in
morals. Hence the inevitable dialectic of pure reason deserves, in a
metaphysics considered as natural predisposition, to be explained not only
as an illusion that needs to be resolved, but also (if one can) as a
natural institution in accordance with its purpose – although this
endeavour, as supererogatory, cannot rightly be required of metaphysics
proper.
The solution to the questions that proceed in the Critique from pages 647
to 668 would have to be taken for a second scholium, more closely related
to the content of metaphysics. For there certain principles of reason are
put forward that determine the order of nature a priori, or rather
determine the understanding a priori, which is supposed to search for the
laws of this order by means of experience. These principles seem to be
constitutive and lawgiving with respect to experience, though they spring
from mere reason, which cannot, like the understanding, be regarded as a
principle of possible experience. Now whether this agreement may rest on
the fact that, just as nature does not in itself inhere in the appearances
or in their source, sensibility, but is found only in the relation of
sensibility to the understanding, so too, a thoroughgoing unity in the use
of this understanding, for the sake of a unified possible experience (in a
system), could belong to the understanding only in relation to reason,
hence experience, too, be indirectly subject to the legislation of reason –
this may be further pondered by those who want to track the nature of
reason even beyond its use in metaphysics, into the universal principles
for making natural history generally systematic; for in the book itself I
have indeed presented this problem as important, but have not attempted its
solution. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena
to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @364]
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Was it? Gee."
DOLF @ 1906 HOURS ON 17 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It seems to convey something of
you..."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0917 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Nope. I've got nothing. What does this mean? It *looks* like
English, but... ?"
DOLF @ 0922 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It wouldn’t be accessible via
GOOGLE SEARCH within a 22 minute timeframe and suggest a collective
[in]vest[iture] and prejudice by yourselves.
Your response is insufficient to establish causality."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0926 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "Wouldn't it? Why?
The biggest conspiracy has always been the fact that there is no
conspiracy. Nobody's out to get you. Nobody gives a shit whether you live
or die. There, you feel better now? [Dennis Miller]
Oh dear! I'm devastated. :("
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 0927 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: “Shouldn't you be in court?”
DOLF @ 1212 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "I’m not at liberty to discuss
either filing deliberations with his Honour, the process of undertakings
agreed to, the proposition in resolving matters of questions nor the
strategy in seeking any legal recourse.
That previous statement ought read:
It wouldn't be accessible via GOOGLE SEARCH within a 22 minute timeframe
and suggests a collective vestige and prejudice by yourselves."
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2 (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1321 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER
2018: "How is this different from what you wrote earlier?"
DOLF @ 1338 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: "It would appear to me that I would
have recourse in relation to non-compliance to COURT ORDERS made upon 13
September 2017 as undertakings by the RESPONDENT but which were not
complied with by the time of the court hearing date of 25 October 2017 with
a clear threat conveyed upon 10 November 2017 and a subsequent equivalent
pursuit resulting in an assault an bodily harm upon 23 November 2017.
Contemporaneously on 13 September, the Federal Government introduced the
Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017. The bill received
royal assent on 13 September and went into effect the following day:
Section 15 - VILIFICATION etc. as a result of expressing views etc. in
relation to the marriage law survey question
(1) After this section commences, a person (the first person) must not
vilify, intimidate or threaten to cause harm to another person or persons
if the first person engaged in the conduct that vilified,
intimidated or threatened the other person or persons because of any of the
following:
(a) the other person or persons have expressed or hold a view in relation
to the marriage law survey question;
(b) the first person believes that the other person or persons hold a view
in relation to the marriage law survey question;
(c) the religious conviction, sexual orientation, gender identity or
intersex status of the other person or persons.
Note 1: This provision is a civil penalty provision which is enforceable
under the Regulatory Powers Act (see section 19 of this Act).
Note 2: For the geographical application of this section, see section 20.
Note 3: For when a broadcaster or carriage service provider does not
vilify, intimidate or threaten to cause harm, see the definition of vilify,
intimidate or threaten to cause harm in section 5.
Civil penalty: 60 penalty units.
(2) The first person does not engage in the conduct referred to in
subsection (1) by reason only of the expression of his or her views about
the marriage law survey question.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply if the conduct is done reasonably and in
good faith and is:
(a) the reporting of news, the presenting of current affairs or any
editorial content in news media; or
(b) the communication of matter solely for genuine satirical, academic or
artistic purposes; or
(c) the communication, distribution or dissemination of any matter
consisting of a publication that is subject to a defence of absolute
privilege in proceedings for defamation.
Note: A person who wishes to rely on subsection (3) in proceedings for a
civil penalty order bears an evidential burden in relation to a matter in
that subsection (see section 96 of the Regulatory Powers Act).
(4) In proceedings for a contravention of subsection (1), it is not
necessary to prove that:
(a) a specific person or group has expressed or holds a view in relation
to the marriage law survey question; or
(b) the first person believes that a specific person or group holds a view
in relation to the marriage law survey question.
<https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2017A00096>
THE SAME SEX MARRIAGE SURVEY WAS HELD VIA THE POSTAL SERVICE BETWEEN 12
SEPTEMBER AND 7 NOVEMBER 2017. And the Act's provisions automatically
expired on 15 November 2017.
DOLF @ 1356 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “That 15 November 2017 was also the
date @ 1228 pictured when I received #419
- SLAUGHTERED MEAT in my mailbox:
<Loading Image...
>#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (figurative);
43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}
[#3, #11, #19, #27, #35, #43, #51, #59, #67]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#THREE}@{
@1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
@2: Sup: 14 (#17); Ego: 11 (#14),
@3: Sup: 33 (#50); Ego: 19 (#33),
@4: Sup: 60 (#110); Ego: 27 (#60),
@5: Sup: 14 (#124); Ego: 35 (#95),
@6: Sup: 57 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
{%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 43 (#138),
@7: Sup: 27 (#208); Ego: 51 (#189),
@8: Sup: 5 (#213); Ego: 59 (#248),
@9: Sup: 72 (#285); Ego: 67 (#315),
Male: #285; Feme: #315
}
Under the auspices of SECTION 9A(2) CRIMES ACT OF VICTORIA 1958 I
repeatedly asked the treasurer of the SALE RETURNED SERVICES LEAGUE (RSL)
if he was either directly or indirectly associated with the KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
INTERNATIONAL as a FREEMASONRY order which is a prohibited foreign power
associated to the Saint Andrews cause célèbre which has a significant event
day upon 30 November and remembering that I had publicly cautioned as
advice that the same sex marriage plebiscite ought to be resolved before
this date and consequent to that it was so undertaken with the results
released upon the 15 November 2017. Additionally the Federal Parliament’s
House of Representatives was prorogued by the Prime Minister, the
Honourable Malcolm Turnbull just prior to 30 November 2017 and remained so
until the 4 December 2017.
(Omitted so as to comply with the probity of the COURT and the decorum of
the ORDERS subject to County Court Appeal Case: AP-18-0775)
[IMAGE: Conveys the RESPONDENT expressing a public opinion about the SAME
SEX MARRIAGE SURVEY which was subject to the Marriage Law Survey
(Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017]
Thus there was clearly instances of *VILIFICATION* etc. as a result of
expressing views etc. in relation to the marriage law survey question since
the RESPONDENT themselves had been photographed @ 0909 HOURS ON 27
SEPTEMBER 2017 placing “VOTE NO” in large taped graffiti upon both their
council RUBBISH BINS.”
DOLF @ 1442 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “That such actions can be
associated to both ANTI-SEMITISM / ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY as ostensibly the
basis for BOER / ANZAC cause célèbre prejudice accompanying unbridled
racial hatred.
YOUTUBE: “Handel's Messiah ‘Comfort Ye’ {#33 - #INRI, #331 - NOT, #419 -
SLAUGHTER on YOM KIPPUR sunset of 26 September 2001; #509 - YAHAD Dead Sea
Scroll Community} and ‘Every Valley Shall Be Exalted’”
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=yrOVjoAp8oc>
41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}
[#1, #9, #17, #25, #33, #41, #49, #57, #65]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#ONE}@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 10 (#11); Ego: 9 (#10),
@3: Sup: 27 (#38); Ego: 17 (#27),
@4: Sup: 52 (#90); Ego: 25 (#52),
@5: Sup: 4 (#94); Ego: 33 (#85),
@6: Sup: 45 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 41 (#126),
@7: Sup: 13 (#152); Ego: 49 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
@8: Sup: 70 (#222); Ego: 57 (#232),
@9: Sup: 54 (#276); Ego: 65 (#297),
Male: #276; Feme: #297
}
Nous: #33
Time: 12:10 hrs
Date: 2018.9.26
Torah: [#10, #7, #30]@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 17 (#27); Ego: 7 (#17),
@3: Sup: 47 (#74); Ego: 30 (#47),
Male: #74; Feme: #47
} // #47
Dao: Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination
Tetra: #35 - Gathering
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest
Latin: Benedictus {God glorified in all things} Alt: Vambel {Repeated
Entrance of God} {
1. AIDS RECONCILIATION & CONJUGAL FAITHFULNESS
2. FRIENDSHIP & AFFABILITY
3. MEMORY, SHREWDNESS & DESIGN
4. Theosulk
}
Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties; that undresses}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#331 / #419} / HETEROS {#395 / #370} / TORAH {#339 /
#423}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:5,col:7,nous:33&idea:{m,87}&idea:{f,89}&idea:{m,331}&idea:{f,419}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 7, nous: 33 [Date: 2018.9.26, Time: 12:10
hrs, Super: #331 / #8 - Worth of Water, Easy By Nature; I-Ching: H48 - The
Well, Welling; Tetra: 40 - Law/Model, Ego: #419 / #33 - Achievable Goals,
Virtue of Discrimination; I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor
Restraint, Small Accumulating, The taming power of the small, Small
harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering]
"AND PILATE WROTE A TITLE, AND PUT IT ON THE CROSS. AND THE WRITING WAS,
JESUS OF NAZARETH THE KING OF THE JEWS {
#I {#10} - THE LEATHERS. "MADE OF THE HIDE OF MNEVIS, WHICH SUTU HATH
SCORCHED," IS THY NAME {#10 - Totality of Nature / #7 - Engendering Nature}
#N {#50} - THE LOOK-OUT. "MASTER OF THE GROUNDS" IS THY NAME {#2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]}
#R {#200} - THE STREAM, SINCE THOU SAILEST UPON ME: "THEIR MIRROR" IS THY
NAME {#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 -
Autonomous Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature] AS IMPLEMENTATION:
{GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)} AND DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE
CHARACTERISTIC HERE}
#I {#10} is an anagram assigned from the PYTHAGOREAN usage of TERNIO which
is derived from the Latin phrase ''IESUS NAZARENUS REX IUDAEORUM''}
INRI@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 17 (#87); Ego: 38 (#98),
@4: Sup: 27 (#114); Ego: 10 (#108),
Male: #114; Feme: #108
} // #270
#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 - TORAH}
- Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.
<Loading Image...
><Loading Image...
>[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:
Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).
*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance]
THIS TITLE THEN READ MANY OF THE JEWS: FOR THE PLACE WHERE JESUS WAS
CRUCIFIED WAS NIGH TO THE CITY: AND IT WAS WRITTEN IN HEBREW, AND GREEK,
AND LATIN. THEN SAID THE CHIEF PRIESTS OF THE JEWS TO PILATE, WRITE NOT,
THE KING OF THE JEWS; BUT THAT HE SAID, I AM KING OF THE JEWS. PILATE
ANSWERED, WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN I HAVE WRITTEN." [John 19:19-22 KJV]
<Loading Image...
>[IMAGE: “Waste Pariah Dogs & Forgotten Garbage (Butcher Paper & Foam) by a
Lone Gum Tree @ Fitzroy Street, Sale” as pictured @ 1212 hours on 24 April,
2012 and an Intellectual Property right association to a trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon: #22 x #41 = #902 - RULE OF LAW
(EGALITÉ), #12 x #41 = #492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 -
HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)
#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach-kill (H2873): 1) to slaughter, slay,
butcher, kill ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to
slay, kill ruthlessly (fig.)
"THEY {#65 - SOLDIER} SHALL GROW *NOT* OLD, AS WE THAT ARE LEFT GROW OLD;
AGE SHALL *NOT* WEARY THEM, NOR THE YEARS CONDEMN. {#231 - JUXTAPOSITION
CONTROL} AT THE GOING DOWN OF THE SUN AND IN THE MORNING
WE WILL REMEMBER THEM." [LEST WE FORGET ODE]
#331 as [#300, #30, #1] = lo'-not (H3808): 1) *NOT*, *NO*; 1a) not (with
verb - absolute prohibition); 1b) not (with modifier - negation); 1c)
nothing (subst); 1d) without (with particle); 1e) before (of time)”
<Loading Image...
>[IMAGE: LETTERS PATENT TO THE FEDERATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
OF 1901 REPRESENTED BY A THEORETICAL MATHEMATICAL TRINOMIAL NOUMENON AS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND IN MY POSSESSION UPON ANZAC DAY PANTOMIME ARREST
OF 25 APRIL 2006]
DOLF @ 1444 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “This sunset at 1805 hours on 18
SEPTEMBER 2018 commences YOM KIPPUR and I have redemption but you will #331
- *NOT*.”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1520 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Yay! A gag order!
The court has done something useful for once. Long may it last!”
AS THEN BEING ENTIRELY MISCHIEVOUS AND THE IMMATERIAL GROUNDS TO ADJOURN
THE MATTER FOR A FURTHER DIRECTIONS HEARING DATE OF 25 OCTOBER 2017.
THIS CLAIM OF YOUR TOTAL LACK OF PERSONAL INTEGRITY AS CIVILITY IS FURTHER
SUSTAINED BY THE FOLLOWING NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE ORDERS MADE BY THE
REGISTRAR OF 13 SEPTEMBER 2017:
#1) FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS OF THE APPLICANT'S APPLICATION HAVE BEEN
FILED WITH THE COURT AND SERVED ON THE RESPONDENT'S MOTHER TODAY.
A) BEFORE THIS WRITTEN ORDER WAS RECEIVED BY THE RESPONDENT, THEY BREACHED
ORDERS (#1) BY PLACING THESE "FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS OF THE
APPLICANT'S APPLICATION" WITHIN MY MAILBOX.
B) THESE WERE PROVIDED BACK TO THE COURT AND THEY THEN CONTACTED THE
RESPONDENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER (#3) AND WHO REFUSED TO ACCEPT THESE
PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINT IN RELATION TO ALLEGED SAINT ANDREWS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE
IMPIOUS ACTIONS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DIRECTIONS HEARING AS A
PROCEEDING WHICH IS MADE UNDER THE PERSONAL SAFETY INTERVENTION ORDERS ACT
2010.
#2) RESPONDENTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS TO BE
FILED WITH THE COURTS BY 12 OCTOBER 2017.
#3) THE COURT REGISTRY TO PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FURTHER AND BETTER
PARTICULARS TO THE APPLICANT ONCE FILED.
A) I HAVE ATTENDED THE COURT ON FRIDAY 13 OCTOBER 2017 AND WAS ADVISED THAT
THE RESPONDENT HAD NOT "FILE RESPONSE TO FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS
WITH THE COURTS BY 12 OCTOBER 2017."
B) THE RESPONDENT HAS CLEARLY NO INTENTION TO EVER CONTEST THE MATTER
DESPITE YOUR PIOUS CLAIMS MADE TO THE COURT, BUT HAS TWICE ENGAGED WITHIN
FURTHER IRRATIONAL SELF JUSTIFYING BEHAVIOUR BY MAKING AGGRESSIVE
INTRUSIONS AT MY FRONT-DOOR DESPITE A NOTICE CONVEYING:
'NO ... COLD CALLERS OR CANVASSERS'
AND IMPROPERLY MAKING VIOLENT THREATS.
DIARY NOTES OF 0820 to 0853 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2017:
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:8.20>
I have @ 0820 HOURS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2017 left a telephone message for
TOWARDS ZERO WASTE management due to my recyclable garbage being FORGOTTEN
this morning of 10 November 2017
<http://www.grapple369.com?date:2017.11.10>
And fortuitously as I was attending to my morning's activities I observed
the two drivers of the TOWARDS ZERO WASTE trucks having a coffee break at
the #123 ANGLICAN CHURCH coffee shop.
— PELLIAN KNELL —
"DREAD IN SISYPHUS DENIAL. OVER HEAVEN'S LAST TRIAL {#123}. THOU DOEST
FREELY TELL. NO CONFESSION TO COMPEL. THE SOUNDING OF THE KNELL.
SO BEGINS DOWNW'D SPIRAL. BY AN EVERLASTING QUELL. TO WELCOME GATES OF
HELL."
I mentioned that they had failed to collect my RECYCLABLE garbage bin and
they conveyed to me that they had observed the RESPONDENT removing the bins
from the street (as that which the RESPONDENT freely admits) and then
placing my FORGOTTEN bin back within the street immediately after
collection.
And they assured me that they will be around shortly to collect the
FORGOTTEN RECYCLABLE GARBAGE BIN.
I conveyed my observations to the RESPONDENT who was threatening and
abusive to such an irrational degree that I had to seek assistance from a
builder who was working on a building site nearby.
<http://www.grapple369.com?time:8.53>
@ 0853 HOURS the TOWARDS ZERO WASTE truck came by and @5 collected the ITEM
which had been intentionally interfered with.
HE SAID, "That fellow who brought out your bin just came to see me."
I REPLIED, "Thank you for confirming his identity and he was only trying to
concoct a story."
< (Omitted so as to comply with the probity of the COURT and the decorum of
the ORDERS subject to County Court Appeal Case: AP-18-0775)>
[IMAGE: Conveys the RESPONDENT threatening me in a manner contrary to the
Marriage Law Survey (Additional Safeguards) Bill 2017]
The RESPONDENT had earlier perused me down the street and was most
obsessive and compulsive in his hostile and irrational manner.
I SAID, "If you have something to contest, then raise it at court."
RESPONDENT replied, "I don't waste my time bringing things to court as I
take care of it myself.
I will do whatever it takes to deal with you."
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1522 HOURS ON
18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “WTF is a ‘collective vestige’?
As far as know, this has no possible meaning.
Have you looked up ‘vestige’ in the dic[t]ionary, Dolf.”
Once again - just stop using words you don't understand and try to express
yourself clearly using the words of your vocabulary.”
DOLF @ 2013 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “It’s derived from the LATIN:
vestīgium n (genitive vestīgiī or vestīgī); second declension
footprint, track
trace, vestige, mark
sole of the foot
horseshoe
(figuratively, of time) moment, instant”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1842 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: I count this one as some of my finest work, despite the
missing context (you can rely on Dolf to disappear the context). I suspect
Dolf agrees, or he wouldn't be reproducing it to such an extent.
On a side note - we were discussing various malapropisms and imaginary
words at work the other day. I sprang to the defence of John Howard's "we
need to incentivise the jobless" and George Bush's "don't misunderestimate
me". There's nothing wrong with making up words if the result is
successfully communicative in either an informational or an entertainment
sense. Getting to the point: I've yet to see Dolf use English creatively in
such a way as to actually communicate anything beyond conveying a sense of
the confused state of his mind.”
DOLF @ 1542 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “WTF is a "collective vestige"?
Oh dry off will you...
YOUTUBE: “Deactivating Hal 9000 HD (COMPLETE)”
— TRUTH WHISPERS AS TEARS IN RAIN —
“WHAT OF GODHEAD.
AND IMAGO DEI.
OR TRUTH CONVEY?
BY PURE CONCEIT.
WHY BE WICKED.
SUCH AS THEE.
OF BLASPHEMY.
SELFISH DECEIT.
WHOM DID BLEED.
WAS IT NOT FOR ME?
YOUR COCK DENY.
NOW ALL FORFEIT.” [Written: 3 December 2017]
YOUTUBE: “Time to Die (Gary Numan)”
“And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to #419 - KILL THE
SOUL: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in
hell.” [Matthew 10:28 (KJV)]
SOUL@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 49 (#99); Ego: 80 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@3: Sup: 25 (#124); Ego: 57 (#187),
@4: Sup: 31 (#155); Ego: 6 (#193),
@5: Sup: 26 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS
{%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 76 (#269),
@6: Sup: 36 (#217); Ego: 10 (#279),
@7: Sup: 5 (#222); Ego: 50 (#329 - *DRY* *OFF* / NEGATION OF PAPAL
PREROGATIVE TO GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS OF 1582),
@8: Sup: 11 (#233); Ego: 6 (#335),
Male: #233; Feme: #335
} // #902
#902 {#22 x #41 = #902 - RULE OF LAW (EGALITÉ), #12 x #41 = #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL (LIBERTÉ), and #391 - HOMOIOS PRINCIPLES (FRATERNITÉ)}
as [#50, #80, #300, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6] = nephesh (H5315): {#18 as #430
% #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*, *SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*, *APPETITE*,
*MIND*, *LIVING* *BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*; 1a) that which
breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the inner being of man;
1b) living being; 1c) living being (with life in the blood); 1d) the man
himself, self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of
emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity of
the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION
MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING)
AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON).
The distinction of ideas, that is of pure concepts of reason, from
categories, or pure concepts of the understanding, as cognitions of
completely different type, origin, and use, is so important a piece of the
foundation of a science which is to contain a system of all these
cognitions a priori that, without such a division, metaphysics is utterly
impossible, or at best is a disorderly and bungling endeavour to patch
together a house of cards, *WITHOUT* *KNOWLEDGE* of the materials with
which one is preoccupied and of their suitability for one or another end.
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #329 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance in
Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_45@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 2 (#3); Ego: 1 (#2),
@3: Sup: 43 (#46); Ego: 41 (#43),
@4: Sup: 45 (#91); Ego: 2 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
Male: #91; Feme: #45
} // #45
G1558@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 25 (#30); Ego: 20 (#25),
@3: Sup: 29 (#59); Ego: 4 (#29),
@4: Sup: 39 (#98); Ego: 10 (#39),
@5: Sup: 59 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE {%17} / I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}); Ego: 20 (#59),
@6: Sup: 48 (#205); Ego: 70 (#129),
@7: Sup: 5 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}); Ego: 38 (#167),
Male: #210; Feme: #167
} // #329
#329 as [#5, #20, #4, #10, #20, #70, #200] = ekdikos (G1558): {UMBRA: #9 as
#329 % #41 = #1} 1) *WITHOUT* *LAW* *AND* *JUSTICE*; 2) exacting penalty
from one; 2a) an avenger, punisher;
YOUTUBE VIDEO: "Maurice Blackburn: Your Right Is My Right"
If the Critique of Pure Reason had done nothing but first point out this
distinction, it would thereby have already contributed more to elucidating
our conception of, and to guiding inquiry in, the field of metaphysics,
than have all the fruitless efforts undertaken previously to satisfy the
transcendent problems of pure reason, without it ever being imagined that
one may have been situated in a completely different field from that of the
understanding, and as a result was listing the concepts of the
understanding together with those of reason as if they were of the same
kind. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to
Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @329]
TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF
*NUMBER*
+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN -
*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}
+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH -
*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}
+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA* *OF*
*AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}
+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273, @274}, 3
{IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF INDIVIDUAL
PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}
THAT THE FIRST OBSERVATION IS UPON THIS #41 - *ONTIC* necessity which is
associated to IDEA: @329 that gives us a notion on temporality being the
beginning of the new year 1 JANUARY which commenced with the #329 -
GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS.
#41 - IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A CLEAR DISTINCTION
MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE UNDERSTANDING)
AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.
Nous: #48
Time: 18:40 hrs
Date: 2018.1.1
Torah: [#40, #6, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 46 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 6 (#46),
@3: Sup: 5 (#91); Ego: 40 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #91; Feme: #86
} // #86
Dao: Forgetting Knowledge
Tetra: #20 - Advance
I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas
Latin: Revalator {God the end of all things} Alt: Mihael {The Who & What of
God} {
1. PROTECTS IN MYSTERIOUS OPERATIONS, BRINGS EVERY EXPERIENCE TO A HAPPY
CONCLUSION
2. SCIENCE OF PHYSICS & MEDICINE
3. HEALTH & LONGEVITY
4. Atembui
}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#329 / #329} / HETEROS {#354 / #382} / TORAH {#354 /
#382}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:8,col:3,nous:48&idea:{m,48}&idea:{f,48}&idea:{m,329}&idea:{f,329}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 3, nous: 48 [Date: 2018.1.1, Time: 18:40
hrs, Super: #329 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance,
Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - Advance, Ego: #329 / #48 -
Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas;
Tetra: 20 - Advance]
Secondly. is our capacity to deduce synaptic connections between various
ideas which Immanuel Kant might elsewhere espouse as then the basis for any
syncretism.
A reasonable postulate could be advanced that there is here an implicit
#312 - CONTENTION due to those #329 - GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS and the
mischievous prerogative BESTOWAL of #390 - WREATHS as RAPACIOUS CONDUCT
being an act of SEDITION:
H3001@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 11 (#17); Ego: 5 (#11),
@3: Sup: 13 (#30); Ego: 2 (#13),
@4: Sup: 23 (#53); Ego: 10 (#23),
@5: Sup: 80 (#133); Ego: 57 (#80),
@6: Sup: 5 (#138); Ego: 6 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #138; Feme: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM* / *RULERS*
} // #329
#329 as [#6, #5, #2, #10, #300, #6] = yabesh (H3001): {UMBRA: #5 as #312 %
#41 = #25} 1) to make dry, wither, be dry, become dry, be dried up, be
withered; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to be dry, be dried up, be without moisture; 1a2)
to be dried up; 1b) (Piel) to make dry, dry up; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to dry
up, make dry; 1c1a) to dry up (water); 1c1b) to make dry, wither; 1c1c) to
exhibit dryness;
EXCERPT FROM LETTER TO STATE / FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERALS DATED 8 NOVEMBER
2017: "Commensurate with our 100 year celebration of the BeerSheba campaign
of the Charge of the Light Horse Brigade as celebrations which occurred on
31 October 2017 and the issue is the partiality and prejudiced Memorial
'Lest We Forget' Tributes comprising SEVEN {5 Wreaths and 2 Bouquets}
floral arrangements which were made during a ceremony presided over by the
RETURNED SERVICE LEAGUE AS A PUBLIC AUTHORITY and laid at only the World
War I and onwards Memorial Shrine for the War Dead upon the Saturday of 28
October 2017.
In the mistaken belief which was propagandised as the consideration that:
Battle of Beersheba 'should be the cornerstone of Australia's identity'
<http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2017/10/29/battle-beersheba-should-be-cornerstone-australias-identity>
No the Boer War is the cornerstone of Australian identity as ethos of
"OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING" and we reject CATEGORICALLY your
unreasoned disloyalty by INTELLECTUAL assent given to Foreign Powers {ie.
especially Irish, Scottish, RSL / Freemasonry / Roman Catholic [by] Saint
Andrews Cause Célèbre} as all unconscionable attempts to impose a
substituted ethic @5 against the INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS
whether by NEGLECT or forced WILL upon our War Dead and to usurp @1 the
Sovereignty embodied within the Governor General as ANTHROPIC COSMOLOGICAL
PRINCIPLE.
Such a statement of value as demonstrated by the inclusion of the State of
Israel's flag amongst the Ca[val]ry [within the] 100 year anniversary
re-enactment of the Battle of Beersheba is a priori, not mantric as dogma,
requires no apologetics and proffers the utmost tactical, endearing and
enduring advantage for posterity as prosperity...
In accordance with this pre-eminent value statement which was heartedly
adopted by the participants within that public ceremony which occurred
within the State of Israel, compliant with the 500 year anniversary of
Martin Luthers nailed #95 treatise which commenced the Protestant
Reformation and the [centenary to the] Balfour Declaration [occurring] 2
November 2017, I had upon Saturday of 28 October 2017 immediately removed
FOUR {3 Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements after th[is]
Remembrance Service made for the Beersheba Centenary and before the actual
events occurring within the State of Israel and doing so [entirely] without
neither authority nor notification given to [or by] another party.
I have thereafter maintained a photographic timeline of events and of
particular note is the regrettable circumstance, that although the THREE {2
Wreaths and 1 Bouquets} floral arrangements were removed from the main
Memorial Shrine, 82 Macalister Street, Sale upon the following Saturday 4
November 2017, they have remained in a dried {#368 as [#6, #10, #2, #300,
#10, #40] as yabesh (H3002): {UMBRA: #3 as #312 % #41 = #25} 1) dry; 2)
dried} state at the Boer War Memorial situated on the corner of York Street
/ Foster Street by the time the COURT ORDERS were made in the matter @ 1025
HOURS on 8 NOVEMBER 2017.
YOUTUBE: "Timbaland - Apologize ft. OneRepublic"
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1549 HOURS ON
15 SEPTEMBER 2018: “Was I being optimistic in hoping that the last vestiges
of your sanity would enable you to provide a sensible answer?”
DOLF @ 1727 HOURS ON 18 SEPTEMBER 2018: “You have no answers yourself
So have a seat in the foyer and take a number...
YOUTUBE: “Imagine Dragons (Thunder)”
42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}
#2 (9) - ILYEL (Seraphim-Throne) = #2
#10 (8) - ELDYAH (Cherubim-Throne) = #12
#18 (7) - KALIEL (Throne-Throne) = #30
#26 (6) - HAEYEH (Dominion-Throne) = #56
#34 (5) - LAHAHAYH (Powers-Throne) = #90
#42 (4) - MIKEL (Virtues-Throne) = #132
#50 (3) - DANIEL (Principalities-Throne) = #182
#58 (2) - YEILEL (Archangels-Throne) = #240
#66 (1) - MANQYAH (Angels-Throne) = #306
[#2, #10, #18, #26, #34, #42, #50, #58, #66]
HETEROS PROTOTYPE {#TWO}@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 30 (#44); Ego: 18 (#30),
@4: Sup: 56 (#100); Ego: 26 (#56),
@5: Sup: 9 (#109); Ego: 34 (#90),
@6: Sup: 51 (#160); Ego: 42 (#132),
@7: Sup: 20 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 50 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}),
@8: Sup: 78 (#258); Ego: 58 (#240),
@9: Sup: 63 (#321); Ego: 66 (#306),
Male: #321; Feme: #306
}
#321 as [#1, #80, #5, #10, #9, #5, #10, #1, #200] = apeitheia (G543): {#12
as #121 % #41 = #39} 1) obstinacy, obstinate *OPPOSITION* *TO* *THE*
*DIVINE* *WILL*;
#321 as [#3, #5, #5, #50, #50, #8, #200] = geenna (G1067): {#13 as #114 %
#41 = #32} 1) *HELL* is the place of the future punishment call Gehenna or
Gehenna of fire. This was originally the valley of Hinnom, south of
Jerusalem, where the filth and dead animals of the city were cast out and
burned; a fit symbol of the wicked and their future destruction;
USURPER: #1 {First Number in the Square}
GUIDE: #9 (3x3) {Last Number in the Square}
MYSTERY: #10 {First Number + Last Number}
ADJUSTER: #15 {Total Sum of a Row}
LEADER: #45 {Total Value of All Rows}
REGULATOR: #60 {Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows}
GENERAL GOVERNOR: #120 {(Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows) x 2}
HIGH OVERSEER: #1080 {((Total Sum of a Row + Total Sum of All Rows) x 2) x
Last Number in the Square}
HETEROS (GK: ετερους = #1080)@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 62 (#67); Ego: 57 (#62),
@3: Sup: 67 (#134); Ego: 5 (#67),
@4: Sup: 5 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13});
Ego: 19 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@5: Sup: 75 (#214); Ego: 70 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}),
@6: Sup: 70 (#284); Ego: 76 (#232),
@7: Sup: 27 (#311); Ego: 38 (#270),
Male: #311; Feme: #270 <-- *NULLIFICATION* *BY* *IMMANUEL* *KANT’S*
PROLEGOMENA TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS PUBLISHED 1783
}
HETEROS (GK: ετερους = #1080): STRONGS: G2087 as NUMBER as other or
different and obtained by Pythagorean reduction as the sum of each Magic
Square Line: @1 (#ONE) ... @5 (#TWO) ... #15 [@6 (#THREE)] ... #34 [@7
(#FOUR)] ... #65 [@2 (#FIVE)] ... #111 [@3 (#SIX)] ... #175 [@4 (#SEVEN)]
... #260 [@8 (#EIGHT)] ... #369 [@9 (#NINE)]:—altered, else, next (day),
one, (an-) other, some, strange #1 - Conservative Business
#2 - Real Estate
#3 - Mining
#4 - Undertakers
#5 - Jailers
#6 - Farmers
#7 - Masons
#8 - Bricklayers
#9 - Populace (?)
DOLF @ 0951 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by Almighty God that if
you ever say something of substance I might add it to my next chapter this
Yom Kippur...”
LIONS GROWL OF BUTCHERS FOUL (***@GMAIL.COM) @ 1002 HOURS ON
19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “I swear by almighty god that if you ever manage to
figure out how to stop top-posting I will stop calling you an idiot.”
DOLF @ 1010 HOURS ON 19 SEPTEMBER 2018: “So how long been talking to your
dick, that is if you can still see it past your belly?“
- dolf
The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>
Initial Post: 18 September 2018 as Yom Kippur edition
You swine.
Dolf, I don't mean you.YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS