— HEY NAZI GIVE IT A REST 💩

[dolf]

— (TRADIES QUESTION: 29 AUGUST 2018) COGNISING CONTINGENCY AND CAPACITY AS
A RATIONAL CONSTRUCT (#364 - ADMITTANCE / #728 - REACTANCE / #312 -
RESISTANCE)

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 29 August, 2018

For necessary purposes of contextualisation, we convey Nick Scarano's
(Assistant Professor at University of Tübingen, Germany) earlier prudent
meta-ethical, moral / political philosophical observation on "why the
[*ONTOLOGICAL*] '*LAWS* *OF* *FREEDOM*' have a comparable modal {

THE MAJOR PREMISE {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of Universal
Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *courses* *of* *priests*
x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the
'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation =
1092 days x 2 = #2184 days;

THE MINOR PREMISE {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of Humanity},
which contains the command to behave in accordance with the law, that is,
the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or
365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox on Wednesday of 20 March 1996 / New
Moon on Thursday of 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

THE CONCLUSION {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of Autonomy},
which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as right in the
case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369 with Septet #41
centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: REMEMBER THE
SABBATH DAY TO KEEP IT HOLY

} status to the '*LAWS* *OF* *NATURE*.' Laws of nature support
counterfactual arguments, too. In order to achieve this, they also must
have a modal status which is higher than simple contingency. The
connections formulated in them are also valid in all natural law governed,
possible worlds, and in this respect, they exhibit the modal status of
necessity. The difference between laws of nature and laws of freedom
appears to consist primarily in the fact that the laws of nature are
concerned with all-quantified, descriptive bi-conditionals, while the laws
of freedom are concerned with all-quantified, normative bi-conditionals,
each receiving the modal status of necessity.

Actually, the type of necessity spoken of here has to be further specified.
Is it a matter of “logical,” “conceptual,” “nomological,” or “metaphysical”
possible worlds? Scarano (2001, chapter 3.2), argues that our moral
principles have a comparable status to the “metaphysical necessity”. To
Kant has to be ascribed the view that it is herewith a matter of
“conceptual necessity." Scarano sees an indication of this interpretation
in the method he applies in the first and second sections. He presupposes
that the content or the formula of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE can be found
solely through the means of the conceptual analysis of our *MORAL*
*CONCEPTS*. At the beginning of the decisive argumentation, he writes,
“Regarding this problem we will first try to see whether perhaps the mere
concept of a CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE does not also provide us with its
formula” (GMS, 420,18—20). And approximately twenty pages later, he asserts
in retrospect: "Yet that the specified principle of autonomy is the sole
principle of morals may well be established through the mere analysis of
the concepts of morality” (GMS, 389, 401, 408, 412, 415). He, therefore,
assumes that he actually was able to extract the formula of the supreme
moral principle solely through a conceptual analysis.

In my opinion, such a proceeding allows only one conclusion: *IF* *THE*
*MORAL* *PRINCIPLE* *CAN* *BE* *PRODUCED* *SOLELY* *THROUGH* *AN*
*ANALYTICAL* *PROCEDURE* *ON* *OUR* *CONCEPT* *OF* *MORALITY*, *THEN* *IT*
*WOULD* *HAVE* *THE* *STATUS* *OF* *CONCEPTUAL* *NECESSITY*. According to
Kant, the founding law of the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE is valid in all
conceptually possible worlds. The queson of which type of necessity moral
principles exhibit, however, is not essential for the ensuing reflections.
[Horn & Schönecker (eds.) Groundwork, Page 10]

2.3 NECESSITY {OBEDIENT}, NORMATIVITY {AIDING} AND APRIORITY {ASSISTING}
A possible but easily avoidable equivocation in the expression [*ONTIC*]
necessity can be cleared up at this juncture. Sometimes the expression is
used in the realm of morality as a synonym of normativity or
prescriptivity. Consequently, actions are necessary if they connote a
“should” or if it is our *DUTY* {

VIS-A-VIS the prescription conveyed by SECTION VIII to Queen Victoria's
Letters Patent of 29 October 1900 as instrumentation to the Federation of
the Australian Commonwealth of 1901: And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND
ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS, CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE
INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth TO BE *OBEDIENT*, *AIDING*, AND
*ASSISTING* unto Our said Governor General

} to carry them out. This type of usage is also found in Kant. In the
central “third proposition” of the first part of the Groundwork, this usage
is clearly expressed: “*DUTY* *IS* *THE* *NECESSITY* *OF* *AN* *ACTION*
*FROM* *RESPECT* *FOR* *THE* *LAW*” (GMS, 400,18 f.). While the [*ONTIC*]
necessity analyzed previously refers to the moral principles, it is here a
matter of the necessity of the action itself. However this aspect is
terminologically classified, whether as “normative,” “prescriptive,”
“evaluative,” or whether one speaks of the imperative character of moral
judgments, it may be distinctly distinguished from the modal-logical
concept of necessity responsible for the counterfactual variations.

In the preliminary formulations (P1) through (P3), this logical quality has
yet to be expressed. In (Pl') the modal status of necessity, therefore, is
explicitly taken up into the formulation:

(P1') Necessarily, for all objects x:
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion C, does x have the moral quality
M.

Applied to Kantian ethics, this thought results in the following
formulation of Kant’s fundamental principle:

(P2') Necessarily, for all actions x: .
if, and only if, x satisfies the criterion CI, does x satisfy the demand of
morality.

The proposition (P3) is also to be completed accordingly:

(P3') Necessarily, for all maxims x and all actions y:
if, and only if, the underlying maxim x of the action y has the quality
that the actor of y can will at the same time that x becomes a general law,
does y satisfy the demand of morality.

In the propositions (Pl') through (P3') this aspect — that is, necessity in
the sense of “normative,” “prescriptive,” or “evaluative” — is indeed
contained. There it is connected, however, to the moral predicate, not the
operator of necessity. When I speak of necessity in the following sections,
I mean a modal quality of judgments and not the specificum of normativity.

Kant uses the expression necessity with yet other meanings. Every
interpretation depends on the clarification in each particular context of
what Kant exactly intends in those corresponding places and of how each
particular argument is to be reconstructed. Next to

(a) the type of usage as a modal operator that makes counterfactual
considerations possible and
(b) the usage in the sense of an imperative character, thus in the sense of
“normativity” or “prescriptivity,” there is
(c) an often encountered usage with an epistemological meaning.

If expression is used in this sense, then it means as much as “necessary
know-ability,” that is, the independence of knowledge from contingent,
empirical factors. Typically, Kant uses the expression a priori for
judgments that exhibit this characteristic. Since this type of usage also
can be clearly distinguished from the modal one, I will speak of apriority
to designate this epistemological aspect. I will use necessity solely in
the first sense (a).

Kant doubtlessly sees a close connection between necessity and apriority.
He often moves quickly from the one concept to the other without grounding
the transition. The two concepts, however, originate from varying spheres.
While necessity is a matter of the modal status of judgments, apriority is
an epistemological concept. In the former case, the concern is the
application of predicates to objects of other possible worlds. In the later
case, it is a matter of the knowability of the relevant judgments. Between
the two concepts there does not seem to be a close conceptual connection.
In particular cases it must be explicitly argued for that apriority follows
from necessity.

Even if Kant sees a very close connection between the two concepts, he does
not appear to assume that necessity and apriority are exchangeable
concepts. In the central passage of the Preface. he formulates rather an
argument for their connection. In the following section, Scarano sketches
out a possible reconstruction of the argumentation's structure on the basis
of the conceptual differences just worked out. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 11-12]

As there being a prerequisite for hypothetical and conjectural postulate of
such cognitive reality which I have desire to grasp (ie. there may be
semantical misapprehensions: mais nous faisons de notre mieux) is a notion
of contingency as a quantum sensibility within the context of a
metaphysical philosophical derivation where there is a normative absence or
a substitution of *ONTIC* necessity as the factuality of being so without
being so and which whilst absent of quantitative certainty yet has a
provisional possibility for occurrence or eventuality.

And we note at this juncture that the signs-‘OTH {#2184 / #364 - ADMITTANCE
{

#8 - Transforming Nature {DOUBLE: #6 - Form of Nature {#9 - Autonomous
Nature} [#505 / #1 - Nature Contains Nature]

IMPLEMENTATION: {GRAVITAS: ASSISTING (#RESH to #TAU)}

DEFINE THE @1 SOVEREIGN PRINCIPLE CHARACTERISTIC HERE

} v’s #2184 / #312 - RESISTANCE {

#10 - Totality of Nature {DOUBLE: #7 - Engendering Nature {#10 - Totality
of Nature}} [#870 / #6 - Form of Nature]

} #2184 / #728 - REACTANCE {

#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature / #1 - Nature Contains Nature: {DOUBLE:
#3 - Nature Surmounts Nature {#6 - Form of Nature}}

}} become reversed in the admittance domain; ie. capacitive susceptance is
positive and inductive susceptance is negative.

ADMITTANCE {YANG CH'I AS MALE} AND RESISTANCE {YIN AS FEME}
Within electrical engineering, admittance is a measure of how easily a
circuit or device will allow a current to flow. It is defined as the
reciprocal of impedance.

Resistance is a measure of the opposition of a circuit to the flow of a
steady current, while impedance takes into account not only the resistance
but also dynamic effects which are known as ‘OTH {#2184 / #3}: #728 -
REACTANCE {

#9 - Autonomous Nature {MOTHER: Scales of Liability} [#671 / #5 - Act of
Nature]

DEFINE THE @5 CANONICAL PRINCIPLE EQUILIBRIUM CHARACTERISTIC HERE

) is here conveyed as substantial form (forma substantialis) by liability.
Likewise, admittance is not only a measure of the ease with which a steady
current can flow, but also the dynamic effects of the material's
susceptance to the contingent eventuality of polarisation.

Within electrical and electronic systems, reactance is the opposition of a
circuit element to a change in current or voltage, due to that element's
inductance or capacitance. The notion of reactance is similar to electrical
resistance, but it differs in several respects.

Thus I wish to obtain as semantical construct some philosophical conception
about the notion of contingency as to the dynamic effect of reactance and
the materia prima susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as materia
secunda as an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing
these normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in
terms of an electrical circuit:

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH} - Share the same
ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 / #693 - TORAH} -
Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin canonicus ‘according to rule’}.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGES: THE TWO THIEVES AS TWEEDLEDUM[B] AND TWEEDLEDEE[D]:

Egyptian ANKH as the basis of Jewish Vassal Idolatry Identity (top).

*ECONOMY* of Fascist / Roman Catholic {ie. hymeneal as marriage / sovereign
dynamic v's Jewish Torah Intellectus as Genitive Voluntātus} Empire
Governance] 

As to what constitutes the substantial form (forma substantialis) of the
formal cause (causa formalis) as to the quintessential first material
(materia prima: Anthropic Cosmological Principle as the absolute
generalized basis of all subsequent individualization that is utterly
potential and is devoid of all attributes or qualities) which is then the
*MIND* as intellectualised universal form (universalia forma), idea, shape
or pattern of the essential or natural image of God (imago Dei essentialis
sive naturalis: that archetypal principal perfections of righteousness,
holiness and wisdom as the likeness or resemblance to God in which man was
originally created).

H5674@{
   @1: Sup: 76 (#76); Ego: 76 (#76),
   @2: Sup: 65 (#141); Ego: 70 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @3: Sup: 67 (#208); Ego: 2 (#148 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%12}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#232); Ego: 38 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   @5: Sup: 74 (#306); Ego: 50 (#236),
   @6: Sup: 80 (#386); Ego: 6 (#242),
   Male: #386; Feme: #242
} // #728

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #728 % #41 = #31 - Military Stratagem, Quelling War; I-Ching: H32 -
Perseverance, Endurance, Duration, Constancy; Tetra: 51 - Constancy;

THOTH MEASURE: #31 - Oh thou who hast different faces, and makest thine
appearance in Net'efit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *INCONSTANT* *MIND*.

    #VIRTUE: With Packing (no. #31), a move home, but
    #TOOLS: With Stoppage (no. #71), a failure to proceed.
    #POSITION: With Stove (no. #44), love of profit.
    #TIME: With Law (no. #40), abhorrence of the cruel.
    #CANON: #186

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_186@{
   @1: Sup: 31 (#31); Ego: 31 (#31),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#52); Ego: 71 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   @3: Sup: 65 (#117); Ego: 44 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#141); Ego: 40 (#186 - I AM NOT ONE OF INCONSTANT MIND
{%31}),
   Male: #141; Feme: #186
} // #186

#728 as [#400, #70, #2, #200, #50, #6] = `abar (H5674): {UMBRA: #5 as #728
% #41 = #31} 1) *TO* *PASS* *OVER* *OR* *BY* *OR* *THROUGH*, alienate,
bring, carry, do away, take, take away, transgress; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to pass
over, cross, cross over, pass over, march over, overflow, go over; 1a2) to
pass beyond; 1a3) to pass through, traverse; 1a3a) passers-through
(participle); 1a3b) *TO* *PASS* *THROUGH* (*THE* *PARTS* *OF* *VICTIM* *IN*
*COVENANT*);

“Then gathered the chief priests and the Pharisees {set apart} a council,
and said, What do we? For this man doeth many miracles.

If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: {

“[Ye] #351 - serpents, [ye] #33 - generation of vipers, how can ye escape
the #312 - damnation of hell?” [Matthew 23:33 (KJV)]

“Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O #33
- generation of #351 - vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the #312 -
wrath to come?” [Luke 3:7 (KJV)]

} and the Romans {strength; power} shall come and take away both our place
and nation.

And one of them, named Caiaphas {he that seeks with diligence; one that
vomiteth}, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know
nothing at all,

Nor consider that it is expedient for us, *THAT* *ONE* *MAN* *SHOULD* *DIE*
*FOR* *THE* *PEOPLE*, and that the whole nation perish not.

And this spake he not of himself: but being high priest that year, he
prophesied that Jesus should die for that nation;

And not for that nation only, but that also he should gather together in
one the children of God that were scattered abroad.

Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death
{

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE: FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.}

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"

The 33 #CENTRE of the first square is the KING as SOVEREIGN / MARRIAGE
dynamic which corresponds to the historic reality of the crucifixion of
Christ on AROUND 1500 HOURS ON FRIDAY, 3 APRIL, 33 A.D.

} Jesus therefore walked no more openly among the Jews; but went thence
unto a country near to the wilderness, into a city called Ephraim
{fruitful; increasing: #15 CE ... #34 CE ... #65 CE ... #111 CE ... #175 CE
... 260 CE ... #369 CE}, and there continued with his disciples.

And the Jews' passover was nigh at hand: and many went out of the country
up to Jerusalem {vision of peace / Jerusha: banished; possession;
inheritance} before the passover, to purify themselves.” [John 11:47-55
(KJV}

1a4) to pass along, pass by, overtake and pass, sweep by; 1a4a) passer-by
(participle); 1a4b) to be past, be over; 1a5) to pass on, go on, pass on
before, go in advance of, pass along, travel, advance; 1a6) to pass away;
1a6a) to emigrate, leave (one's territory); 1a6b) to vanish; 1a6c) to
perish, cease to exist; 1a6d) to become invalid, become obsolete (of law,
decree); 1a6e) to be alienated, pass into other hands; 1b) (Niphal) to be
crossed; 1c) (Piel) to impregnate, cause to cross; 1d) (Hiphil); 1d1) to
cause to pass over, cause to bring over, cause to cross over, make over to,
dedicate, devote; 1d2) to cause to pass through; 1d3) to cause to pass by
or beyond or under, let pass by; 1d4) to cause to pass away, cause to take
away; 1e) (Hithpael) to pass over;

Which then results in the second matter (materia secunda) as the basis for
all material existence (essentia: indicates the entire whatness of a thing
including the materiality or spirituality as its substantia) as the
integrity and authenticity of being within the world and living in
compliance (status integritatis) as obedience with the terms of the innate
*MORAL* (lex moralis primordialis).

“FOR THE CHILDREN OF THIS WORLD {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as BELIAL - ANKH /
ROMAN} ARE IN THEIR GENERATION WISER THAN THE CHILDREN OF LIGHT {#123}."
[Luke 16:8 (KJV)]

"I AM FROM ABOVE {#41 - Remember the Sabbath ... #82 - Honour your parents
... #123 - Do not kill ... #164 - Avoid heteronomy against autonomy ...
#205 - Do not steal ... #246 - Bear false witness ... #287 - Covet Not ...
#328 ... #369}: YE ARE OF THIS WORLD {

@1 ...
@5 ...
#15 (@6: #260) ...
#34 (@7: #175) ...
#65 (@2: #34) ...
#111 (@3: #65) ...
#175 (@4: #369) ...
#260 (@8: #111) ...
#369 (@9: #15)

}; I AM NOT OF THIS WORLD.” [John 8:23 (KJV)]

"AND JESUS ANSWERING SAID UNTO THEM, THE CHILDREN {#SEVEN: #117 / #351 as
BELIAL - ANKH / ROMAN} OF THIS WORLD MARRY {#ONE: #99 / #297 <-- *AS* *THE*
*FOUNDATION* *STONE* (*USURPING* @1 = *SOVEREIGN* / #CENTRE @5 = *LAST*
*WILL*, *TESTAMENT* *OF* #INR *BEING* *THE* *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA*
*OBLIGANS* ) *ON* #33 AD) *MAGIC* *SQUARE

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

#1 (9) - OUHOUYAH (King-Seraphim) = #1
#9 (8) - HAZIEL (King-Cherubim) = #10
#17 (7) - LEVYAH (King-Throne) = #27 <-- SOVEREIGNTY / PYTHAGOREAN TERNIO
ANAGRAM TO #INR
#25 (6) - NETEHYAH (King-Dominion) = #52 <-- *THEY* *ARE* *AS* *THE* *SONS*
*OF* *DARKNESS* *NOT* *THE* *SONS* *OF* *LIGHT* / *GOD* *AS* #123

#33 (5) - YHOUYAH (King-Powers) = #85 <-- ADAMANT {ie. fixed mind /
dogmatic} / DIAMOND 💍
#41 (4) - HEHAHEL (King-Virtues) = #126
#49 (3) - OHOUEL (King-Principalities) = #175 <-- *VENUS* (7x7 = #49 /
#175) *USE* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *AS* *AN* *ANTHROPIC* *PROTOTYPE*

#57 (2) - NEMAMYAH (King-Archangels) = #232
#65 - *SOLDIER* (1) - DAMBYAN (King-Angels) = #297

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE
as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

45 5 61
53 37 21
13 69 29

= #111 / #333 {#FIVE}

Whilst it may continue to function as an acceptable METHODOLOGY {ARCH KAI
TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10} with an encapsulated sphere of
operation, it is entirely a specious notion to declare it is the root and
causal basis of the perennialist philosophical tradition:

41 1 57
49 33 17
9 65 25 = #99 / #297 {#ONE}

42 2 58
50 34 18
10 66 26 = #102 / #306 {#TWO}

43 3 59
51 35 19
11 67 27 = #105 / #315 {#THREE}

#419 as [#9, #2, #8, #400] = tabach (H2873): {#2 as #19 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #THREE: #105 / #315} 1) to slaughter, slay, butcher, kill
ruthlessly; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to slaughter, butcher; 1a2) to slay, kill
ruthlessly (figurative);

44 4 60
52 36 20
12 68 28 = #108 / #324 {#FOUR}

#419 as [#2, #1, #6, #400, #10] = 'avvah (H185): {#0 as #12 *INTERFERENCE*
*MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH*/ *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE*
*PROTOTYPE* #FOUR: #108 / #324} 1) desire, lust, will (not necessarily
evil);

49 9 65
57 41 25
17 73 33 = #123 / #369 {#NINE} AS IT'S NATURAL PROGRESSION {#1 / #73
SUBSTITUTION}

74 81 76
79 77 75
78 73 80 = #231 - #108 = #123 / #693 - #369 = #324 {#TEN} AS RETURN TO
GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE BEING ITSELF

My objection has always been ROMAN CATHOLICS / FREEMASONRY imposing {#17 /
#33 - #INR / #65 - SOLDIER} a @5 - substituted HETEROS ethic upon our {#390
/ #288 / #419} war dead and usurping the @1 - SOVEREIGNTY of the #391 -
HOMOIOS basis to our Commonwealth’s Governance which is defined as a
PRINCIPLE that is circumscribed {#13 / #21 / #37} by Queen Victoria’s
Letters Patent of 17 September 1900 as the instrumentation of Federation
into a nation.

}, AND ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE {#175 AS ANTHROPIC PROTOTYPE}: BUT THEY WHICH
SHALL BE ACCOUNTED WORTHY TO OBTAIN THAT WORLD, AND THE RESURRECTION FROM
THE DEAD, NEITHER MARRY, NOR ARE GIVEN IN MARRIAGE: NEITHER CAN THEY DIE
ANY MORE: FOR THEY ARE EQUAL UNTO THE ANGELS; AND ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD {

#123 as [#6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #700] = ben (H1121): {UMBRA: #75 as #123 %
#41 = #41} 1) *SON*, grandson, child, member of a group; 1a) son, male
child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young
men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons
of injustice [for un- righteous men] *OR* *SONS* *OF* *GOD* [*FOR*
*ANGELS*]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie
sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*,
*CLASS*;

}, BEING THE CHILDREN OF THE RESURRECTION." [Luke 20:34-36 (KJV)]

Which as a habit and capacity of will by its exercise of intellect as being
primarily intentioned to be regulated by the innate understanding which
grasps the basic principles of the *MORAL* law and spontaneously acts
according to the dictates as wants and desires of conscientia) and the
natural law (ie. the universal *MORAL* law either impresses by God upon the
*MIND* of all the people or immediately discerned by the reason in its
encounter with the order of nature) as a covenant of nature (foedus
naturae: predicated on the original integrity of human nature and its
capacity for obedience under the terms if the innate *MORAL* or natural
law) bestowed upon us by the graciousness of God.

STRATEGIC: SUCCESS AND MATERIAL GAIN
VIII - And We do hereby REQUIRE and COMMAND ALL OUR OFFICERS AND MINISTERS,
CIVIL AND MILITARY, AND ALL OTHER THE INHABITANTS of Our said Commonwealth
TO BE OBEDIENT, AIDING, AND ASSISTING unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, INCAPACITY, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, FROM TIME TO TIME, under the PROVISIONS OF THESE OUR
LETTERS PATENT, ADMINISTER THE GOVERNMENT of Our said Commonwealth.

Thanks for your assistance!

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 29 August 2018

#CONTINGENCY #DEATH #INCAPACITY
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS

[dolf]

-- BUDDHISM EXPOSED AS HAVING NEO NAZI ANTI-BIBLICIST {#215 / #235 - TABLE
TALK} VIEWS

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 26 September, 2018

DOLF @ 1737 HOURS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Each answers for their own soul
and there is #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN upon yours since you have
never shown respect.

I see that you have no explanation for exhibiting equivalent neo Nazi
ANTI-BIBLICIST {#215 / #235 - TABLE TALK} values and conveying Jesus as
little more than a personality hero cult figure: 'FOR THOSE BRAVE WHO GAVE
THEIR LIVES SO WE COULD LIVE OURS.'"

WISE TIBETANMONKEY, MOST HUMBLE PHILOSOPHER (***@GMAIL.COM) @
0305 HOURS ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Saying that Jesus is smarter than me is
like saying I play an instrument better than these guys"

YOUTUBE: "Adventure Of A Lifetime (Coldplay)"

DOLF @ 1025 HOURS ON 23 SEPTEMBER 2018: "WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A
DILDO AND A BUDDHA STATUE?

An Orgasm {#684 as [#70, #100, #3, #1, #200, #40, #70, #200] = from Greek
ὀργασμός orgasmos meaning: excitement, swelling}

ORGASM@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 8 (#78); Ego: 19 (#89),
@3: Sup: 11 (#89); Ego: 3 (#92),
@4: Sup: 12 (#101 ***); Ego: 1 (#93),

#492 - *VOLUNTARY* *FREEWILL* {#41 = #12 - CIRCULARITY OF BEING} -
#391 - *HOMOIOS* *FRATERNITY* =
#101 - #KORPPIONOIKEUS AS ANY VEXATION MEANING: 'THE #260 - RAVEN / RAPE IS
RIGHT'

@5: Sup: 50 (#151); Ego: 38 (#131),
@6: Sup: 9 (#160); Ego: 40 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE
{%20}),
@7: Sup: 79 (#239); Ego: 70 (#241),
@8: Sup: 36 (#275); Ego: 38 (#279),
Male: #275; Feme: #279
} // #684

H2000@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 16 (#22); Ego: 10 (#16),
   @3: Sup: 21 (#43); Ego: 5 (#21),
   @4: Sup: 61 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 40 (#61),
   @5: Sup: 13 (#117); Ego: 33 (#94),
   Male: #117; Feme: #94
} // #101

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #101 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block;
*I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
   @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
   @2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
   @3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S
WIFE {%19}),
   Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

#101 as [#6, #10, #5, #40, #600] = hamam (H2000): {UMBRA: #36 as #101 % #41
= #19} 1) to move noisily, confuse, make a noise, discomfit, break,
*CONSUME*, *CRUSH*, *DESTROY*, *TROUBLE*, *VEX*; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to move
noisily; 1a2) *TO* *CONFUSE*, *DISCOMFIT*, *VEX*;

SECTION #4 - THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE PROLEGOMENA: IS METAPHYSICS AT ALL
POSSIBLE?
The Critique of Pure Reason investigates this question synthetically. In
it, an abstract examination of the concepts of the sources of pure reason
results in knowledge of the actual science of metaphysics. The Prolegomena,
on the other hand, starts with the known fact that there is actual
synthetic a priori metaphysical knowledge of pure mathematics and pure
natural science. From this knowledge, analytically, we arrive at the
sources of the possibility of metaphysics. [Wikipedia
2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]

[IDEA @271] ... In the Critique of Pure Reason I worked on this question
synthetically, namely by inquiring within pure reason itself, and seeking
to determine within this source both the elements and the laws of its pure
use, according to principles. This work is difficult and requires a
resolute reader to think himself little by little into a system that takes
no foundation as given except reason itself, and that therefore tries to
develop cognition out of its original seeds without relying on any fact
whatever. Prolegomena should by contrast be preparatory exercises; they
ought more to indicate what needs to be done in order to bring a science
into existence if possible, than to present the science itself. *THEY*
*MUST* *THEREFORE* *RELY* *ON* *SOMETHING* [IDEA: @275] *ALREADY* *KNOWN*
*TO* *BE* *DEPENDABLE*, *FROM* *WHICH* *WE* *CAN* *GO* *FORWARD* *WITH*
*CONFIDENCE* *AND* *ASCEND* *TO* *THE* *SOURCES*, *WHICH* *ARE* *NOT* *YET*
*KNOWN*, *AND* *WHOSE* *DISCOVERY* *NOT* *ONLY* *WILL* *EXPLAIN* *WHAT*
*IS* *KNOWN* *ALREADY*, *BUT* *WILL* *ALSO* *EXHIBIT* *AN* *AREA* *WITH*
*MANY* *COGNITIONS* *THAT* *ALL* *ARISE* *FROM* *THESE* *SAME* *SOURCES*.
The methodological procedure of prolegomena, and especially of those that
are to prepare for a future metaphysics, will therefore be analytic.

TETRAGRAMMATON {ARCH KAI TELOS OIDA: #1 + #2 + #3 +#4 = #10 } HIERARCHY
VALUE AS THE METAPHYSICAL CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE TO THE HOMOIOS THEORY OF
*NUMBER*

+ 0, 27 {IDEA: @311}, 54 {IDEA: @348} {ie. REALM OF ITS NATURE AS HEAVEN -
*FORMULA* *FOR* *UNIVERSAL* *LAW*}

+ 0, 9 {IDEA: @282}, 18 {IDEA: @298} {ie. SYSTEM’S COSMOLOGY AS EARTH -
*FORMULA* *OF* *HUMANITY*}

+ 0, 3 {IDEA: @270}, 6 {IDEA: @280} {ie. SELF IDENTITY - *FORMULA* *OF*
*AUTONOMY* *AS* *SUI* *JURIS* / *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*}

+ 1 {IDEA: @265, @266}, 2 {IDEA: @267, @268, @269, @272, @273, @274}, 3
{IDEA: @265 - PREAMBLE, @270} {ie. *FORMULA* *OF* *PROGRESSION* OF
INDIVIDUAL PHENOMENA: *CONJECTURAL* *ONLY*}

#41 - ONTIC NECESSITY: IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH METAPHYSICS AS A SCIENCE, A
CLEAR DISTINCTION MUST BE MADE BETWEEN THE CATEGORIES (PURE CONCEPTS OF THE
UNDERSTANDING) AND THE IDEAS (PURE CONCEPTS OF REASON) {IDEA: @329}.

Fortunately, it happens that, even though we cannot assume that meta-
physics as science is actual, we can confidently say that some pure
synthetic cognition a priori is actual and given, namely, pure mathematics
and pure natural science; for both contain propositions that are fully
acknowledged, some as apodictically certain through bare reason, some from
universal agreement with experience (though these are still recognized as
independent of experience). We have therefore some at least uncontested
synthetic cognition a priori, and we do not need to ask whether it is
possible (for it is actual), but only: how it is possible, in order to be
able to derive, from the principle of the possibility of the given
cognition, the possibility of all other synthetic cognition a priori.
[CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's Prolegomena to Any
Future Metaphysics, IDEA @275]

SECTION #5 - THE GENERAL PROBLEM: HOW IS KNOWLEDGE FROM PURE REASON
POSSIBLE?

By using the analytical method, we start from the fact that there are
actual synthetic a priori propositions and then inquire into the conditions
of their possibility. In so doing, we learn the limits of pure reason.
[Wikipedia 2018:Prolegomena_to_Any_Future_Metaphysics]

[IDEA: @276] All metaphysicians are therefore solemnly and lawfully
suspended from their occupations until such a time as they will have
satisfactorily answered the question: How are synthetic cognitions a priori
possible? For in this answer alone consists the credential which they must
present if they have something to advance to us in the name of pure reason;
in default of which, however, they can expect only that reasonable persons,
who have been deceived so often already, will reject their offerings
without any further investigation.

If, on the contrary, they want to put forth their occupation not as
science, but as an art of beneficial persuasions accommodated to general
common sense, then they cannot justly be barred from this trade. They will
then use the modest language of reasonable belief, they will acknowledge
that it is not allowed them even once to guess, let alone to know,
something about that which lies beyond the boundaries of all possible
experience, but only to assume something about it (not for speculative use,
for they must renounce that, but solely for practical use), as is possible
and even indispensable for the guidance of the understanding and will in
life. *ONLY* *THUS* *WILL* *THEY* *BE* *ABLE* *TO* *CALL* *THEMSELVES*
*USEFUL* *AND* *WISE* *MEN*, *THE* *MORE* *SO*, *THE* *MORE* *THEY*
*RENOUNCE* *THE* *NAME* *OF* *METAPHYSICIANS*; *FOR* *METAPHYSICIANS*
*WANT* *TO* *BE* *SPECULATIVE* *PHILOSOPHERS*, *AND* since one cannot aim
for vapid probabilities when judgments a priori are at stake (for what is
alleged to be cognized a priori is thereby announced as necessary), it
*CANNOT* *BE* *PERMITTED* *THEM* *TO* *PLAY* *WITH* *GUESSES*, *BUT*
*RATHER* *THEIR* *ASSERTIONS* *MUST* *BE* *SCIENCE* *OR* *THEY* *ARE*
*NOTHING* *AT* *ALL*.

It can be said that the whole of transcendental philosophy, which
necessarily precedes all of metaphysics, is itself nothing other than
simply the complete solution of the question presented here, but in
systematic order and detail, and that until now there has therefore been no
transcendental philosophy; for what goes under this name is really a part
of metaphysics, but this science is to settle the possibility of
metaphysics in the first place, and therefore must precede all
metaphysics.2 Hence there need be no surprise because a science is required
that is utterly deprived of assistance from other sciences, hence is itself
completely new, in order just to answer a single question adequately, when
the solution to it is conjoined with trouble and difficulty and even with
some obscurity.

In now setting to work on this solution – and indeed following the analytic
method, in which we presuppose that such cognitions from pure reason are
actual – we can appeal to only two sciences of theoretical knowledge (which
alone is being discussed here), namely, pure mathematics and pure natural
science; for only these can present objects to us in intuition, and
consequently, *IF* *THEY* *HAPPEN* *TO* *CONTAIN* *AN* *A* *PRIORI*
*COGNITION*, *CAN* *SHOW* *ITS* *TRUTH* *OR* *CORRESPONDENCE* *WITH* *THE*
*OBJECT* *IN* *CONCRETO*, i.e., its actuality, from which one could then
proceed along the analytic path to the ground of its possibility. This
greatly facilitates the work, in which general considerations are not only
applied to facts, but even start from them, instead of, as in the synthetic
procedure, *HAVING* *TO* *BE* *DERIVED* *WHOLLY* *IN* *ABSTRACTO* *FROM
CONCEPTS*. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, Kant's
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, IDEA @279]

WISE TIBETANMONKEY, MOST HUMBLE PHILOSOPHER (***@GMAIL.COM) @
1511 HOURS ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2018: "Jesus didn't have a clue about the world.
I take from the East and the West, the North and the South to put together
a universal culture in diversity.

Jesus was an outcast Jew. He's only a hero in America. 😩"

DOLF @ 0924 HOURS ON 26 SEPTEMBER 2018: "BUDDHIST {STATUE THROUGH MY WINDOW
@ 0041 HOURS ON 11 OCTOBER 2017 BEFORE BEERSHEBA CENTENNIAL COMMEMORATIONS}
BAALIM {idols; masters; false gods} EXPOSED AS HAVING NEO NAZI
ANTI-BIBLICIST {#215 / #235 - TABLE TALK} VIEWS OF BEOR {burning; foolish;
mad} SON OF BALAAM {the ancient of the people; the destruction of the
people}:

This is the *KNOWLEDGE* *OF* *THINGS* *IN* *THE* *DIVINE* *MIND*
*OPERATING* *INTELLECTUALLY*. From this fountain of Eternal Nature, flows
down the Pythagorean numbers *ONE* and *TWO*--which from Eternity, in the
fountain of the immense Ocean, was, shall be, or rather always is,
abundantly streaming. This *ONE* was by the Ancients termed [“Zeus”] as
Jupiter; *TWO* as [“Hera”]

G1520@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
   @3: Sup: 44 (#104); Ego: 70 (#125),
   @4: Sup: 1 (#105); Ego: 38 (#163),
   Male: #105; Feme: #163
} // #325


T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #215 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra: 41 -
Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.

#VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
#TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
#POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
#TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
#CANON: #86 <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *JUDGES* / *ELOHYM* / *RULERS*

#325 {#5x#5 = #65 - *SOLDIER*} as [#5, #50, #70, #200] = heis (G1520): {#12
as #215 % #41 = #10} 1) *ONE*;

At this stage of appraisal, Kant appears to be procrastinatory {ie. as the
habitual/intentional delay of starting or finishing a task despite its
negative consequences} and conveys the ambiguous thought on ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI that it was self-contradictory by nature. But, some other
philosophers treated it as valid. But what are examples of ANALYTIC A
POSTERIORI knowledge?

Is determining the length of the tropical year from a base-7 chronology of
364 days an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” knowledge?

364 x 294 (ie. 364 x 6 x 49) = 107,016 days / 293 = 365.2423208191126

Is defining the TELOS as #6000 % 22 = 13 September 2001 with a #41 as ONTIC
necessity of the *APEIRON* also an example of “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI”
knowledge?

#0 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 4000 BCE

... [THE APEIRON] ...

#8800 MOD 22 = 22 [#TAU / #400 - Jacob {He takes by the heel, he supplants,
That supplants, undermines; the heel}] as 8800 CE

APEIRON@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
@3: Sup: 5 (#87); Ego: 5 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
@4: Sup: 15 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#96),
@5: Sup: 34 (#136); Ego: 19 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@6: Sup: 23 (#159); Ego: 70 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
@7: Sup: 73 (#232); Ego: 50 (#235 - ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK IDEA @235
ON 7 JUNE 1942 AS SHOOTING ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY OF THESE SELF-STYLED
BIBLE STUDENTS (BIBELFORSCHER}),
Male: #232; Feme: #235
} // #316

APEIRON (ἄπειρον) is a Greek word meaning "(that which is) unlimited,"
"boundless", "infinite", or "indefinite"[1] from ἀ- a-, "without" and
πεῖραρ peirar, "end, limit", "boundary",[2] the Ionic Greek form of πέρας
peras, "end, limit, boundary". It is akin to Persian piramon, meaning
"*BOUNDARY*, *CIRCUMFERENCE*, *SURROUNDING*".

My approach to this at this stage is to acknowledge that Kant considers
that noumena is impossible to conceive by Pure Thought and therefore he
doesn’t fully conceive any “ANALYTIC A POSTERIORI” possibility and it’s
notion of TETRAGRAMMATON is itself an a priori postulate but as a
recursive enumeration giving forth a trinomial #NUMBER definition as
process of “SYNTHETIC A POSTERIORI” by it's as formulation of progression.
This dialectic is then in turn consistent with Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE as rationalism being an intellectual conception:

+ 0, 27, 54 - HEAVEN: Universal Law {@1}
+ 0, 9, 18 - EARTH: Humanity {@2}
+ 0, 3, 6, - SEA: Autonomy {@3}
+ 1, 2, 3 - FOUNTAIN: Progression {@4}

Thus the ANALYTIC {YANG CH’I} A PRIORI given by the alternative HOMOIOS
mathematical notion of #NUMBER with the recursive necessity of an #41 -
ONTIC {NORMA OBLIGANS} meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism:
REMEMBER THE SABBATH and it’s SYNCRETIC {YIN CH’I} A PRIORI such as beIng
SAPIENT with the recursive necessity of an #82 - ONTIC {MANIFESTING NORM}
meta-prototype conveyed by the Intellectualism: HONOUR PARENTS is a
conception of fecundity by its capacity in producing or capable of
producing offspring, fruit, vegetation, etc., in abundance; prolific;
fruitful: fecund parents; fecund farmland and hence its equinox
association."

- dolf

The various PDF resources being essays as work in progress notations for
the prospect of producing a viable syncretism with Immanuel Kant's Ground
Work for the Metaphysics of Morals are now available within the directory:

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

Initial Post: 26 September 2018

#BUDDHISM #ANTIBIBLICIST #NAZISM #215 #235


— ANZACS WHAT FOR? {@1} —

“OUR ANZACS WENT TO WAR. {@2}
HITLER WAS A CORPORAL. {@3}
IT WAS FOR NOTHING MORE. {@4}
PRINCIPLE RIGHT OR MORAL. {@5}

ANZACS DIED SO MAY WE LIVE. {@6}
TO SEE HITLER IN THE MIRROR. {@7}
NO REASON CAN THEY GIVE. {@8}
HIS REFLECTION OUR TERROR. {@9 - #342}

GOVERNOR GENERAL KNEELS. {@10}
TO PAPAL RING CONFOUND. {@11}
FROM US THE EMPIRE STEALS. {@12}
DEAD UPON BARREN GROUND.” {@13}

2.2 THE MODAL STATUS OF AN ETHICAL PRINCIPLE
In order to express modal relations, one can make use of the
possible-worlds terminology common in semantics. In case we decide for A
and successfully translate this decision into action, then A is an object
of the actual world, and B is solely an object of a possible world. We
judge both objects With recourse to the same principles. That means,
however, that these principles express something not only about the actual
world but also about other, possible worlds. Since these principles
indicate a strength beyond that of contingency, it appears that they
exhibit the modal status of necessity. [Horn & Schönecker (eds.)
Groundwork, Page 10]

ANZACS-WHAT-FOR?@{
    @1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 38 (#38),
    @2: Sup: 3 (#22); Ego: 14 (#52),
    @3: Sup: 77 (#99); Ego: 52 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
    @4: Sup: 43 (#142); Ego: 6 (#110),
    @5: Sup: 74 (#216); Ego: 49 (#159),
    @6: Sup: 69 (#285); Ego: 73 (#232),
    @7: Sup: 2 (#287); Ego: 67 (#299),
    @8: Sup: 21 (#308); Ego: 22 (#321),
    @9: Sup: 78 (#386); Ego: 21 (#342 - TORAH PROTOTYPE: #FIVE / ANKH
EGYPTIAN ROMAN PROTOTYPE: #SIX {#114 / #342} BY POSITION AS OPINION: {#5 +
#6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED
IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM}),

As a philosophical conception {#2184} about the notion of contingency as to
the dynamic effect of #728 - REACTANCE and the MATERIA PRIMA {#364}
susceptibility to eventuality of polarisation as MATERIA SECUNDA {#312} as
an alternative canonical approach to mathematically expressing these
normative {ie. YANG CH'I as MALE / YIN as FEME} bi-conditionals in terms:

[cf: DIAGRAM OF THE MYSTERY (HSUAN T'U) by YANG HSIUNG, CANON OF SUPREME
MYSTERY (T'AI HSUAN CHING) syncretism published 4 / 2 BCE, HAN DYNASTY: 206
BC to 220 AD), page 456]

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 - TORAH}
- Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}.

    @10: Sup: 3 (#389); Ego: 26 (#368),
    @11: Sup: 76 (#465); Ego: 68 (#436),
    @12: Sup: 26 (#491); Ego: 6 (#442),
    @13: Sup: 30 (#521); Ego: 28 (#470),
    Male: #521; Feme: #470
}

G2570@{
   @1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
   @2: Sup: 21 (#41); Ego: 1 (#21),
   @3: Sup: 51 (#92); Ego: 30 (#51),
   @4: Sup: 40 (#132); Ego: 70 (#121),
   @5: Sup: 35 (#167); Ego: 76 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
   Male: #167; Feme: #197
} // #521

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #321 % #41 = #34 - Great Guide, Trust in its Perfection; I-Ching:
H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay, Correcting, Work on what has been
spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra: 27 - Duties;

THOTH MEASURE: #34 - Oh Nefertmu, who makest thine appearance in Memphis;
*I* *AM* *NEITHER* *A* *LIAR* *NOR* *A* *DOER* *OF* *MISCHIEF*.

    #VIRTUE: With Kinship (no. #34), drawing close to goodness, but
    #TOOLS: With Closure (no. #74), closing out feelings of obligation.
    #POSITION: As to Closure (no. #74), both are shut off, but
    #TIME: As to Closeness (no. #33), all use the One.
    #CANON: #215

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_215@{
   @1: Sup: 34 (#34); Ego: 34 (#34),
   @2: Sup: 27 (#61); Ego: 74 (#108),
   @3: Sup: 20 (#81); Ego: 74 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
   @4: Sup: 53 (#134); Ego: 33 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF
MISCHIEF {%34}),
   Male: #134; Feme: #215
} // #215

#521 as [#20, #1, #30, #70, #400] = kalos (G2570): {UMBRA: #35 as #321 %
#41 = #34} 1) beautiful, handsome, *EXCELLENT*, *EMINENT*, *CHOICE*,
*SURPASSING*, *PRECIOUS*, *USEFUL*, *SUITABLE*, *COMMENDABLE*, *ADMIRABLE*;
1a) beautiful to look at, shapely, magnificent; 1b) good, excellent in its
nature and characteristics, and therefore well adapted to its ends; 1b1)
genuine, approved; 1b2) precious; 1b3) *JOINED* *TO* *NAMES* *OF* *MEN*
*DESIGNATED* *BY* *THEIR* *OFFICE*, *COMPETENT*, *ABLE*, *SUCH* *AS* *ONE*
*OUGHT* *TO* *BE*; 1b4) *PRAISEWORTHY*, *NOBLE*; 1c) beautiful by reason of
purity of heart and life, and hence praiseworthy; 1c1) *MORALLY* *GOOD*,
*NOBLE*; 1d) *HONOURABLE*, *CONFERRING* *HONOUR*; 1e) affecting the mind
agreeably, comforting and confirming;

G5046@{
   @1: Sup: 57 (#57); Ego: 57 (#57),
   @2: Sup: 62 (#119); Ego: 5 (#62),
   @3: Sup: 11 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 30 (#92),
   @4: Sup: 16 (#146 - I AM NOT A LAND-GRABBER {%15}); Ego: 5 (#97),
   @5: Sup: 26 (#172); Ego: 10 (#107),
   @6: Sup: 15 (#187); Ego: 70 (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING {%29}),
   @7: Sup: 65 (#252); Ego: 50 (#227),
   Male: #252; Feme: #227
} // #470

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #620 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching:
H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 -
Already Fording, Completion;

THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance at
Re-Stau; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *SLAYER* *OF* *MEN*.

    #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
    #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
    #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
    #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
    #CANON: #115

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_115@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 50 (#55); Ego: 45 (#50),
   @3: Sup: 29 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 60 (#110),
   @4: Sup: 34 (#118); Ego: 5 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
   Male: #118; Feme: #115
} // #115

#470 as [#300, #5, #30, #5, #10, #70, #50] = teleios (G5046): {UMBRA: #24
as #620 % #41 = #5} 1) brought to its end, finished; 2) wanting nothing
necessary to completeness; 3) perfect; 4) that which is perfect; 4a)
*CONSUMMATE* *HUMAN* *INTEGRITY* *AND* *VIRTUE*; 4b) of men; 4b1) full
grown, adult, of full age, mature; *MEMBRUM* *VIRILE*

G138@{
   @1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
   @2: Sup: 35 (#40); Ego: 30 (#35),
   @3: Sup: 24 (#64); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @4: Sup: 64 (#128); Ego: 40 (#145),
   @5: Sup: 69 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}); Ego: 5 (#150 - I
INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}),
   @6: Sup: 38 (#235); Ego: 50 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED PROPERTY
{%8}),
   @7: Sup: 27 (#262); Ego: 70 (#270),
   @8: Sup: 65 (#327); Ego: 38 (#308),
   Male: #327; Feme: #308
} // #470

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32 - Natural Guide, Virtue of Holiness; I-Ching: H44 -
Encounter, Coming On, Coupling, Coming to meet, Meeting; Tetra: 43 -
Encounters;

THOTH MEASURE: #32 - Oh Busy one, who makest thine appearance at Utenit;
*I* *DO* *NOT* *STEAL* *THE* *SKINS* *OF* *THE* *SACRED* *ANIMALS*.

    #VIRTUE: With Legion (no. #32), gentle softness, but
    #TOOLS: With Hardness (no. #72), cold firmness.
    #POSITION: As to Ritual (no. #48), it is the capital, but
    #TIME: As to Residence (no. #39), it is the home.
    #CANON: #191

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_191@{
   @1: Sup: 32 (#32); Ego: 32 (#32),
   @2: Sup: 23 (#55); Ego: 72 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @3: Sup: 71 (#126); Ego: 48 (#152),
   @4: Sup: 29 (#155); Ego: 39 (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE
SACRED ANIMALS {%32}),
   Male: #155; Feme: #191
} // #191

#470 as [#5, #30, #70, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] = haireomai (G138): {UMBRA:
#14 as #237 % #41 = #32} 1) *TO* *TAKE* *FOR* *ONESELF*, *TO* *PREFER*,
*CHOOSE*; 2) *TO* *CHOOSE* *BY* *VOTE*, *ELECT* *TO* *OFFICE*;

DOLF @ 2244 HOURS ON 10 SEPTEMBER 2018: "IF ESSO / EXXON MOBILE BOSSES HAVE
BENT THEIR KNEE TO PAPAL AUTHORITY {

VIRTUE as MIND: {#1 + #2 = #3} +
TOOLS as SCIENCE: {#3 + #4 = #7} +
POSITION as OPINION: {#5 + #6 = #11 as Collegium of Pontiffs from 510 BCE
as AS PONTIFICATED DEIFIED IGNORANCE BEING NARCISSISM} +
TIME as SENSE: {#7 + #8 = #15}

= #36 (ie. H27 - Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law +
H9 - System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity)

6x6 = #36 / #111 / #666 {#FIVE AS #CENTRE VALUE TO THE GNOME}

#1 {#99 / #297 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #6 {#123 / #369 - TORAH & 114 / #342 -
ANKH / ROMAN} - Share the same ancestor;
#2 {#102 / #306 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #7 {#132 / #396 - TORAH} - Share the same
light;
#3 {#105 / #315 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #8 {#141 / #423 - TORAH} - Become good
friends;
#4 {#108 - *PROGENITOR* / #324 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #9 {#231 - *AT* *THE*
*GOING* *DOWN* *OF* *THE* *SUN* *AND* *IN* *THE* *MORNING* / #693 - TORAH}
- Keep a common way;
#5 {#111 / #333 - ANKH / ROMAN} / #5 {#114 / #342 - TORAH} - Protect each
other {Latin CANONICUS ‘according to rule’}

} AS #351 - BELIAL THEN THEY HAVE SHOWN MORE THAN A DISRESPECT AGAINST THE
FEDERATION AS AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH WHICH IS NOW PROTECTED AND SUCH AS
GATES OF HELL WILL NEVER PREVAIL: [Matthew 16:18 (KJV)]

"GOD HATH NOT CAST AWAY HIS PEOPLE WHICH HE FOREKNEW. WOT YE NOT WHAT THE
SCRIPTURE SAITH OF ELIAS {GOD THE LORD, THE STRONG LORD}? HOW HE MAKETH
INTERCESSION TO GOD AGAINST ISRAEL, SAYING, 'LORD, THEY HAVE KILLED THY
PROPHETS, AND DIGGED DOWN THINE ALTARS; AND I AM LEFT ALONE, AND THEY SEEK
MY LIFE.

BUT WHAT SAITH THE ANSWER OF GOD UNTO HIM? *I* *HAVE* *RESERVED* *TO*
*MYSELF* *SEVEN* *THOUSAND* *MEN*, *WHO* *HAVE* *NOT* *BOWED* *THE* *KNEE*
{eg: *POPE* *URGES* *OIL* *ENERGY* *EXXON* *MOBILE* *BOSS* *TO* *LEAD* *ON*
*ENVIRONMENT*} *TO* *THE* *IMAGE* *OF* *BAAL* {#351}.

EVEN SO THEN AT THIS PRESENT TIME ALSO THERE IS A REMNANT ACCORDING TO THE
ELECTION OF GRACE.

AND IF BY GRACE, THEN IS IT NO MORE OF WORKS: OTHERWISE GRACE IS NO MORE
GRACE. BUT IF IT BE OF WORKS, THEN IS IT NO MORE GRACE: OTHERWISE WORK IS
NO MORE WORK.

WHAT THEN? ISRAEL HATH NOT OBTAINED THAT WHICH HE SEEKETH FOR; BUT THE
ELECTION HATH OBTAINED IT, AND THE REST WERE BLINDED (ACCORDING AS IT IS
WRITTEN, GOD HATH GIVEN THEM THE SPIRIT OF SLUMBER, EYES THAT THEY SHOULD
NOT SEE, AND EARS THAT THEY SHOULD NOT HEAR;) UNTO THIS DAY.

AND DAVID {WELL-BELOVED, DEAR} SAITH, LET THEIR *TABLE* *BE* *MADE* *A*
*SNARE*, AND A TRAP, AND A STUMBLING-BLOCK, AND A RECOMPENSE UNTO THEM: LET
THEIR EYES BE DARKENED, THAT THEY MAY NOT SEE, AND BOW DOWN THEIR BACK
ALWAY. I SAY THEN, HAVE THEY STUMBLED THAT THEY SHOULD FALL? GOD FORBID:
BUT RATHER THROUGH THEIR FALL SALVATION IS COME UNTO THE GENTILES, FOR TO
PROVOKE THEM TO JEALOUSY.

NOW IF THE *FALL* *OF* *THEM* *BE* *THE* *RICHES* *OF* *THE* *WORLD*, AND
THE *DIMINISHING* *OF* *THEM* *THE* *RICHES* *OF* *THE* *GENTILES*; *HOW*
*MUCH* *MORE* *THEIR* *FULNESS*?

FOR I SPEAK TO YOU GENTILES, INASMUCH AS I AM THE APOSTLE OF THE GENTILES,
I MAGNIFY MINE OFFICE {#366 as [#4, #10, #1, #20, #70, #50, #10, #1, #200]
= diakonia (G1248): ministry}..." [Romans 11:2-13 (KJV)]

G1248@{
   @1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
   @2: Sup: 14 (#18); Ego: 10 (#14),
   @3: Sup: 15 (#33); Ego: 1 (#15),
   @4: Sup: 35 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 20 (#35),
   @5: Sup: 24 (#92); Ego: 70 (#105),
   @6: Sup: 74 (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}); Ego: 50 (#155),
   @7: Sup: 3 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 10 (#165),
   @8: Sup: 4 (#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}); Ego: 1 (#166
- I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11}),
   @9: Sup: 42 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34});
Ego: 38 (#204),
   Male: #215 <-- SEE IDEA @215 FROM HITLER'S *TABLE* *TALK*; Feme: #204
} // #366

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #166 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *MAN* *OF* *VIOLENCE*.

    #VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
    #TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
    #TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
    #CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
   @1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
   @2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
   @3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
   @4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#34 (@7 - Engendering Nature: #175 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#82 -
HONOUR YOUR PARENTS {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage}]) / #3 - Nature
Surmounts Nature: {DOUBLE: #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature {#5 - Act of
Nature}} ...

OBLIGANS: {
84: [2 *** *PAPAL* *BREACHES* *OF* *SOVEREIGNTY* *BY* *WORLD* *WAR* *ONE*
*SOLAR* *ECLIPSE* 9 JUNE 2018],
86: [10],
102: [4],
104: [7],
115: [5]
}

#111 (@3 - Nature Surmounts Nature: #65 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature
[#164 - AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY {#4 - favour, affection:
Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 - Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307
CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INRI}]) / #11 / #8 - Transforming Nature: {DOUBLE:
#4 - Nature Amended in its Nature {#7 - Engendering Nature}} ...

OBLIGANS: {
166: [11 *** *PAPAL* *BREACHES* *OF* *SOVEREIGNTY* *BY* *WORLD* *WAR*
*ONE* *SOLAR* *ECLIPSE* 9 JUNE 2018]
168: [26],
169: [18],
171: [20],
173: [27],
175: [22],
177: [29],
180: [19],
181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6],
184: [36],
185: [25],
186: [31],
191: [32],
192: [39],
196: [37],
197: [33],
200: [8]
}

#366 as [#4, #10, #1, #20, #70, #50, #10, #1, #200] = diakonia (G1248):
{UMBRA: #17 as #166 % #41 = #2} 1) *SERVICE*, *MINISTERING*, *ESPECIALLY*
*OF* *THOSE* *WHO* *EXECUTE* *THE* *COMMANDS* *OF* *OTHERS*; 2) of those
who by the command of God proclaim and promote religion among men; 3) the
ministration of those who render to others the offices of Christian
affection esp. those who help meet need by either collecting or
distributing of charities; 4) the office of the deacon in the church; 5)
the service of those who prepare and present food; 2a) of the office of
Moses; 2b) *OF* *THE* *OFFICE* *OF* *THE* *APOSTLES* *AND* *ITS*
*ADMINISTRATION*; 2c) of the office of prophets, evangelists, elders etc.;

YOUTUBE: "Disturbed - The Sound Of Silence [Official Music Video]"

— IRISH CATHOLIC SAINT PATRICK’S PLAGUE —

“TREASON ONLY TREASON.
TO BE SURE, TO BE SURE. {#1 - PIECE CUT OFF} THERE IS NO OTHER REASON.
LEPRECHAUN CAUSE SO PURE.

DOES CURSE OUR SOVEREIGN.
AND FLETCH {provide (an arrow) with feathers for flight} THE PAPAL ARSE.
{#2 - LE JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL}
SUCH LOVE WHICH YOU FEIGN.
AS JINGOISTIC PIOUS FARCE.”

YOUTUBE: “Qantas Australia Home - TV Ad 1998”

- dolf

Initial Post: 25 September 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS